Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Spletno mesto bo delovalo z omejenimi zmožnostmi, medtem ko na njem izvajamo vzdrževalna dela za vas. Če članki ne rešijo vaše težave in želite zastaviti vprašanje, naša skupnost za podporo čaka na vas na @FirefoxSupport na Twitterju in na /r/firefox na Redditu.

Iskanje po podpori

Izogibajte se prevarantski tehnični podpori. Nikoli vam ne bomo naročili, da pokličete telefonsko številko ali nam pošljete osebne podatke. Sumljivo dejavnost prijavite z gumbom »Prijavi zlorabo«.

Več o tem

Disable auto closing of (HTML etc.) tags?

  • 2 odgovora
  • 1 ima to težavo
  • 20 ogledov
  • Zadnji odgovor od DTWD

more options

Is there a way to prevent Firefox trying to be helpful and close tags that aren't closed in code?

We are trying to trace a problem with code built from from about 10 different templates and finding where a missing tag is difficult when the browser keeps closing them. - The page is only "built" just before being delivered to the browser.

I appreciate I am in a minority, but I would rather my development browser fail to render the page instead helping by inserting unclosed tags, in this case in the wrong place hence why we noticed the problem.

Many thanks.

Is there a way to prevent Firefox trying to be helpful and close tags that aren't closed in code? We are trying to trace a problem with code built from from about 10 different templates and finding where a missing tag is difficult when the browser keeps closing them. - The page is only "built" just before being delivered to the browser. I appreciate I am in a minority, but I would rather my development browser fail to render the page instead helping by inserting unclosed tags, in this case in the wrong place hence why we noticed the problem. Many thanks.

Izbrana rešitev

Are you using the Inspector? In order to build a DOM for you to view, Firefox does sometimes have to guess/decide the boundaries of different elements. So you're right: this view is not useful for your purposes, except that seeing the boundaries in the wrong places may provide important clues.

To see the raw source sent by the server, you can always use Ctrl+u or right-click > View Page Source (not View Selection Source, clear the selection in that case). It's usually ugly, but you could try using a validator to analyze it if pasting it into a syntax-highlighting editor doesn't help you resolve the issue.

Now... if you retrieve HTML in the background and insert it into the page, that is not in the original source. If you use the Network Monitor, you should be able to view the actual server responses to individual AJAX requests. See: https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Tools/Network_Monitor

Preberite ta odgovor v kontekstu 👍 0

Vsi odgovori (2)

more options

Izbrana rešitev

Are you using the Inspector? In order to build a DOM for you to view, Firefox does sometimes have to guess/decide the boundaries of different elements. So you're right: this view is not useful for your purposes, except that seeing the boundaries in the wrong places may provide important clues.

To see the raw source sent by the server, you can always use Ctrl+u or right-click > View Page Source (not View Selection Source, clear the selection in that case). It's usually ugly, but you could try using a validator to analyze it if pasting it into a syntax-highlighting editor doesn't help you resolve the issue.

Now... if you retrieve HTML in the background and insert it into the page, that is not in the original source. If you use the Network Monitor, you should be able to view the actual server responses to individual AJAX requests. See: https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Tools/Network_Monitor

more options

Thank you Jscher, being able to view the source like that is just what we need.

It would have been nice if the inspector had an option for it, but I can drop the code into an editor and work through it.

Thank you!