Spletno mesto bo delovalo z omejenimi zmožnostmi, medtem ko na njem izvajamo vzdrževalna dela za vas. Če članki ne rešijo vaše težave in želite zastaviti vprašanje, naša skupnost za podporo čaka na vas na @FirefoxSupport na Twitterju in na /r/firefox na Redditu.

Iskanje po podpori

Izogibajte se prevarantski tehnični podpori. Nikoli vam ne bomo naročili, da pokličete telefonsko številko ali nam pošljete osebne podatke. Sumljivo dejavnost prijavite z gumbom »Prijavi zlorabo«.

Več o tem

!important / @namespace

  • 2 odgovora
  • 1 ima to težavo
  • 1 ogled
  • Zadnji odgovor od deanone

more options

Is it still necessary to use both !important and @namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul) inside userChrome?

Is it still necessary to use both ''!important'' and ''@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul)'' inside userChrome?

Izbrana rešitev

I've been on a warpath against using @namespace for nearly four years. Ref. https://www.userchrome.org/adding-style-recipes-userchrome-css.html#namespaces

You need !important in many cases to overcome the sometimes unpredictable way that browsers apply the precedence rules of the CSS cascade: https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/CSS/Cascade

Preberite ta odgovor v kontekstu 👍 0

Vsi odgovori (2)

more options

Izbrana rešitev

I've been on a warpath against using @namespace for nearly four years. Ref. https://www.userchrome.org/adding-style-recipes-userchrome-css.html#namespaces

You need !important in many cases to overcome the sometimes unpredictable way that browsers apply the precedence rules of the CSS cascade: https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/CSS/Cascade

more options

Thanks for that. I have been suspicious of @namespace for some time. I will omit it for the time being.