Spletno mesto bo delovalo z omejenimi zmožnostmi, medtem ko na njem izvajamo vzdrževalna dela za vas. Če članki ne rešijo vaše težave in želite zastaviti vprašanje, naša skupnost za podporo čaka na vas na @FirefoxSupport na Twitterju in na /r/firefox na Redditu.

Iskanje po podpori

Izogibajte se prevarantski tehnični podpori. Nikoli vam ne bomo naročili, da pokličete telefonsko številko ali nam pošljete osebne podatke. Sumljivo dejavnost prijavite z gumbom »Prijavi zlorabo«.

Več o tem

junk controls & IMAP keywords

  • 2 odgovora
  • 1 ima to težavo
  • 1 ogled
  • Zadnji odgovor od Morgan

more options

Does TB add the ‘junk’ and ‘nonjunk’ keywords to email on IMAP servers (which support keywords) when determining email as junk (or not) and moving it to the spam folder (or not) whatever that happens to be named?

Does TB add the ‘junk’ and ‘nonjunk’ keywords to email on IMAP servers (which support keywords) when determining email as junk (or not) and moving it to the spam folder (or not) whatever that happens to be named?

Izbrana rešitev

I believe it does. There was a bug a few years ago about Thunderbird not using the IMAP spam tagging or whatever and it was an issue with yahoo and that was fixed.

Preberite ta odgovor v kontekstu 👍 1

Vsi odgovori (2)

more options

Izbrana rešitev

I believe it does. There was a bug a few years ago about Thunderbird not using the IMAP spam tagging or whatever and it was an issue with yahoo and that was fixed.

more options

Many thanks - now I know where the tags (or at least some of them) are coming from - it seems peculiar that TB is using 'nonjunk' instead of 'notjunk' as defined here: https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-jmap-keywords/imap-jmap-keywords.xhtml But, there does seem some confusion between the two, see here: https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-jmap-keywords/notjunk/notjunk-template ['... set or clear $NonJunk at any time.']