Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

Ky sajt do të funksionojë me kufizime, teksa bëjmë mirëmbajtjen e tij për të përmirësuar punën tuaj. Nëse një artikull nuk e zgjidh problemin tuaj dhe dëshironi të bëni një pyetje, kemi bashkësinë tonë të asistencës, e gatshme për t’ju ndihmuar, te @FirefoxSupport në Twitter dhe/r/firefox në Reddit.

Kërkoni te Asistenca

Shmangni karremëzime gjoja asistence. S’do t’ju kërkojmë kurrë të bëni një thirrje apo të dërgoni tekst te një numër telefoni, apo të na jepni të dhëna personale. Ju lutemi, raportoni veprimtari të dyshimtë duke përdorur mundësinë “Raportoni Abuzim”.

Mësoni Më Tepër

"Content-Type" header code execution

more options

We are looking to find a fix for the code execution bug found in May of 2021:

Mozilla Firefox is vulnerable to code execution by a remote attacker who can convince a user to open a malicious file. By manipulating the "Content-Type" header of a file the attacker can cause Firefox to execute scripts concealed in files that appear to be of non-executable types.

We are looking to find a fix for the code execution bug found in May of 2021: Mozilla Firefox is vulnerable to code execution by a remote attacker who can convince a user to open a malicious file. By manipulating the "Content-Type" header of a file the attacker can cause Firefox to execute scripts concealed in files that appear to be of non-executable types.

Zgjidhje e zgjedhur

If you use my test document you will see that Firefox 96 still works the same way: when the server indicates this combination:

Content-Type: text/html Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=test.jpg

Firefox corrects the file name during the save process from test.jpg to test.jpg.html and you can open it as an HTML page rather than a corrupt JPEG image.

I don't know whether anyone has filed a bug. Normally security researchers would have done that before making a public disclosure but it is hard to search for security bugs.

If you want to file a new bug:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/

Lexojeni këtë përgjigje brenda kontekstit 👍 0

Krejt Përgjigjet (5)

more options

Can you link to information about that vulnerability? To prevent a delay in your post appearing, add a space before the .com or .org in your link. (Otherwise, the reply is sent to the link spam moderation queue.)

more options
more options

I think this is what they're doing:

https://www.jeffersonscher.com/res/test_jpg.php

Adding screenshot of download dialog:

Ndryshuar nga jscher2000 - Support Volunteer

more options

That was the site I saw about this issue but no official notice or fix which is what is needed.

more options

Zgjidhja e Zgjedhur

If you use my test document you will see that Firefox 96 still works the same way: when the server indicates this combination:

Content-Type: text/html Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=test.jpg

Firefox corrects the file name during the save process from test.jpg to test.jpg.html and you can open it as an HTML page rather than a corrupt JPEG image.

I don't know whether anyone has filed a bug. Normally security researchers would have done that before making a public disclosure but it is hard to search for security bugs.

If you want to file a new bug:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/