We're calling on all EU-based Mozillians with iOS or iPadOS devices to help us monitor Apple’s new browser choice screens. Join the effort to hold Big Tech to account!

Овај сајт ће имати ограничену функционалност док га будемо ажурирали у циљу побољшања вашег искуства. Ако неки чланак не реши ваш проблем и желите да поставите питање, на располагању ће вам бити наше заједнице подршке @FirefoxSupport на Twitter-у и /r/firefox на Reddit-у.

Претражи подршку

Избегните преваре подршке. Никада од вас нећемо тражити да зовете или шаљете поруке на број или да делите личне податке. Пријавите сумњиве радње преко „Пријавите злоупотребу” опције.

Сазнај више

Firefox ESR 91.12

  • 9 одговорa
  • 0 има овај проблем
  • 1 преглед
  • Последњи одговор послао Mike Kaply

more options

Hello, Qualys is detecting Vulnerabilites on our Firefox ESR 91.12 Versions which were patched by MFSA2022-29.

It is showing Vulnerabilities because MFSA2022-30 lists CVE's for ESR 102.X and we are on 91.12.

Is there anywhere I can go to get a list of all Vulnerabilities on 91.X to show our Security team, I believe CVE-2022-36314 and CVE-2022-2505 are not present in 91.12 because they are not listed in https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2022-29/ but need evidence

Thank You,

Hello, Qualys is detecting Vulnerabilites on our Firefox ESR 91.12 Versions which were patched by MFSA2022-29. It is showing Vulnerabilities because MFSA2022-30 lists CVE's for ESR 102.X and we are on 91.12. Is there anywhere I can go to get a list of all Vulnerabilities on 91.X to show our Security team, I believe CVE-2022-36314 and CVE-2022-2505 are not present in 91.12 because they are not listed in https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2022-29/ but need evidence Thank You,

Изабрано решење

CVE-2022-36314 was not fixed in Firefox 91 ESR.

See:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1773894#c25

ESR was not affected by CVE-2022-2505.

Прочитајте овај одговор са објашњењем 👍 0

Сви одговори (9)

more options

I can't speak for Qualys, but it looks like there is a 91.13.0esr out today. Maybe that will help?

more options

Thank you for the Reply. This doesn't help though. Is CVE-2022-36314 and CVE-2022-2505 present in ESR 91.12.

more options

As you have seen, there is no indication in the Mozilla security alerts that Firefox 91.x is affected by the local .lnk issue. The bug report linked in the alert typically is confidential. Maybe someone who reads this thread is authorized to read it (I am not).

more options

Thank you for the information on the local .lnk issue. Is there anyway to get someone who has authority to reply regarding this?

more options

Btw the Fx 91.13.0 ESR Released today is the last main update for the old Fx 91.0 ESR channel as when Fx 105.0 is Released there will only be the Fx 102.3 ESR for a supported ESR version.

more options

Thank you for the information, we did update to 91.13 and will work with the owner of the server to get ESR updated to 102.3 next month. In the meantime, I need to prove CVE-2022-36314 and CVE-2022-2505 are not present in ESR 91.12, can someone please respond with the answer to the question.

Thank You,

more options

Одабрано решење

CVE-2022-36314 was not fixed in Firefox 91 ESR.

See:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1773894#c25

ESR was not affected by CVE-2022-2505.

more options

Thank you Mike! So CVE-2022-36314 is present in ESR 91.12?

more options

> Thank you Mike! So CVE-2022-36314 is present in ESR 91.12?

It was both complex and not a high severity issue and 102 ESR can be used.