Şu anda bakım nedeniyle sitemiz kısıtlı işlevsellik sunmaktadır. Mevcut makaleler sorununuzu çözmediyse ve bize soru sormak isterseniz Twitter’da @FirefoxSupport hesabından ve Reddit’teki /r/firefox subreddit'inden destek gönüllülerimize ulaşabilirsiniz.

Avatar for Username

Mozilla Destek’te Ara

Destek dolandırıcılığından kaçının. Mozilla sizden asla bir telefon numarasını aramanızı, mesaj göndermenizi veya kişisel bilgilerinizi paylaşmanızı istemez. Şüpheli durumları “Kötüye kullanım bildir” seçeneğini kullanarak bildirebilirsiniz.

Daha Fazlasını Öğren

Bu başlık arşivlendi. Yardıma ihtiyacınız varsa lütfen yeni bir soru sorun.

Where is a check that http://ciscobinary.openh264.org/openh264.. is safe? Why no https and no hash for it?

  • 3 yanıt
  • 1 kişi bu sorunu yaşıyor
  • 1 gösterim
  • Son yanıtı yazan: John99

askm3
askm3
more options

It's downloaded on first start, by default, without consent, from insecure connection.

https://ciscobinary.openh264.org/ has certificate errors : "ciscobinary.openh264.org uses an invalid security certificate. .. valid for a248.e.akamai.net, *.akamaized.net, *.akamaihd-staging.net, *.akamaihd.net, *.akamaized-staging.net)

On http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=2886203 someone is saying it may be a threat. On https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009816 they discuss installation with manifest and hashes - but I did not see it happened in that case. I assume windows certificates as not safe - but are they even checked with this install and how could it be enough?

Why no https at least? What about hash?

It's downloaded on first start, by default, without consent, from insecure connection. https://ciscobinary.openh264.org/ has certificate errors : "ciscobinary.openh264.org uses an invalid security certificate. .. valid for a248.e.akamai.net, *.akamaized.net, *.akamaihd-staging.net, *.akamaihd.net, *.akamaized-staging.net) On http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=2886203 someone is saying it may be a threat. On https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009816 they discuss installation with manifest and hashes - but I did not see it happened in that case. I assume windows certificates as not safe - but are they even checked with this install and how could it be enough? Why no https at least? What about hash?

Seçilen çözüm

http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3025690:

> Bug 1102531 - On-demand download of Cisco H.264 plugin should occur over HTTPS > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1102531

Bu yanıtı konu içinde okuyun 👍 0

Tüm Yanıtlar (3)

askm3
askm3 Sorunun sahibi
more options

Part of an answer ( https://wiki.mozilla.org/GeckoMediaPlugins ):

GMPs can only be loaded out-of-process, there is no in-process option. Furthermore, child processes may be sandboxed, so GMPs cannot depend on being able to do things outside of the sandbox (like write to disk).

The child process will load the GMP's DLL into the process, then call the publicly exposed GMPInit function. Next Gecko will call the publicly exposed GMPGetAPI function, requesting the desired API data (see the Base API section for more info).

askm3
askm3 Sorunun sahibi
more options

Seçilen çözüm

http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3025690:

> Bug 1102531 - On-demand download of Cisco H.264 plugin should occur over HTTPS > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1102531

John99
John99
more options

That's good work. It did not take you too long to figure out. It does however highlight the advantages of implementing

  • Bug 1102531 - On-demand download of Cisco H.264 plugin should occur over HTTPS

Unfortunately at Mozilla there are often limited resources and a need to prioritise work, and for various reasons - including a security comment #c2 -- that bug looks like its on the back burner.