Şu anda bakım nedeniyle sitemiz kısıtlı işlevsellik sunmaktadır. Mevcut makaleler sorununuzu çözmediyse ve bize soru sormak isterseniz Twitter’da @FirefoxSupport hesabından ve Reddit’teki /r/firefox subreddit'inden destek gönüllülerimize ulaşabilirsiniz.

Mozilla Destek’te Ara

Destek dolandırıcılığından kaçının. Mozilla sizden asla bir telefon numarasını aramanızı, mesaj göndermenizi veya kişisel bilgilerinizi paylaşmanızı istemez. Şüpheli durumları “Kötüye kullanım bildir” seçeneğini kullanarak bildirebilirsiniz.

Daha Fazlasını Öğren

Message filter rules and junk training/logging

  • 1 yanıt
  • 1 kişi bu sorunu yaşıyor
  • 16 gösterim
  • Son yanıtı yazan: Matt

more options

I recently started getting a huge amount of junk emails. The junk settings were missing most of these. I got tired of point-and-click manually identifying these messages as junk so I added a message filter rule that 1) identifies words in the body, 2) sets junk status to junk, 3) moves messages to junk on local folders, and 4) "white lists" good messages with the same words in the body. I do not see messages that my message filter rule catches in the adaptive junk filter log. Is Thunderbird's adaptive junk filter learning from the messages that my message filter rule is catching, yes/no?

I recently started getting a huge amount of junk emails. The junk settings were missing most of these. I got tired of point-and-click manually identifying these messages as junk so I added a message filter rule that 1) identifies words in the body, 2) sets junk status to junk, 3) moves messages to junk on local folders, and 4) "white lists" good messages with the same words in the body. I do not see messages that my message filter rule catches in the adaptive junk filter log. Is Thunderbird's adaptive junk filter learning from the messages that my message filter rule is catching, yes/no?

Tüm Yanıtlar (1)

more options

Steve H said

2) sets junk status to junk, Is Thunderbird's adaptive junk filter learning from the messages that my message filter rule is catching, yes/no?

Yes