This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

تلاش سپورٹ

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

مزید سیکھیں

Cannot preview themes by hovering cursor

  • 1 جواب دیں
  • 1 میں یہ مسئلہ ہے
  • 3 دیکھیں
  • آخری جواب بذریعہ TyDraniu

more options

I haven't used themes for a long time, but remember that under older versions of Firefox, when viewing the hundreds of available themes, one only had to hover the cursor over the theme image in order to see how it would look. I am running Firefox Version 63.0.3, and it appears that this preview is no longer available. However, the Firefox Help Script says, "To see what a background theme will look like before installing it, simply hover over it." Has some part of my Firefox installation become corrupted, or is the script no longer incorrect?

I haven't used themes for a long time, but remember that under older versions of Firefox, when viewing the hundreds of available themes, one only had to hover the cursor over the theme image in order to see how it would look. I am running Firefox Version 63.0.3, and it appears that this preview is no longer available. However, the Firefox Help Script says, "To see what a background theme will look like before installing it, simply hover over it." Has some part of my Firefox installation become corrupted, or is the script no longer incorrect?

منتخب شدہ حل

The script is incorrect at the moment. We don't know yet, if they're going to fix this feature some day.

See also this question.

اس جواب کو سیاق و سباق میں پڑھیں 👍 1

تمام جوابات (1)

more options

منتخب شدہ حل

The script is incorrect at the moment. We don't know yet, if they're going to fix this feature some day.

See also this question.