This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Avatar for Username

تلاش سپورٹ

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

مزید سیکھیں

اس تھریڈ کو آرکائیوکیا گیا تھا۔ اگر آپ کو مدد کی ضرورت ہو تو براہ مہربانی نیا سوال پوچھیں۔

maildir file types

  • 2 جواب دیں
  • 1 میں یہ مسئلہ ہے
  • 1 دیکھیں
  • آخری جواب بذریعہ LaVerne2

HughP
HughP
more options

Upgraded from TB 60.9.1 to 78 (via 68). Always set up as a maildir account, with no problems at all.

Pre-upgrade, the mail files had no extension; post upgrade, they are all .eml. My mail folders now contain a mixture of .eml files (long complex filenames), and files with no extension (e.g. just called "1565451542668000"), which look pretty much like .eml files when I view them with Notepad.

Question: should I take any action to convert the no-extension files to .eml files in order to avoid any problems with searching, for example, or is it OK to have this odd mix of file types in the mail folders? Maybe just rename all the no-extension files to .eml, or perhaps do an export/import operation to do the job for me? I somehow think it would be better if all files in the mail folders had the same extension.

Upgraded from TB 60.9.1 to 78 (via 68). Always set up as a maildir account, with no problems at all. Pre-upgrade, the mail files had no extension; post upgrade, they are all .eml. My mail folders now contain a mixture of .eml files (long complex filenames), and files with no extension (e.g. just called "1565451542668000"), which look pretty much like .eml files when I view them with Notepad. Question: should I take any action to convert the no-extension files to .eml files in order to avoid any problems with searching, for example, or is it OK to have this odd mix of file types in the mail folders? Maybe just rename all the no-extension files to .eml, or perhaps do an export/import operation to do the job for me? I somehow think it would be better if all files in the mail folders had the same extension.

تمام جوابات (2)

HughP
HughP سوال کا مالک
more options

Here's what I did in the end: Dragging and dropping files out of and back into TB didn't seem too reliable with multiple files selected, so I just added .EML file extensions to all the files that had no extension. Then rebuilt the .msf files for each changed folder, as well as the global search database. As far as I can see, everything works just fine in TB. I then added the folder path to Windows Search, making sure that EML file types were registered for searching file properties and contents, with the MIME search filter. Windows Search can now find anything in the folders that I updated, as well as the TB search options. Hope this helps!

LaVerne2
LaVerne2
more options

I have a question about maildir in Thunderbird: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1320435

You, apparently,have been using it for some time. Does it work well? Is it reliable? Much of what I have searched out leaves it in doubt, and at best, experimental. Confident documentation does not seem to exist. What is your take on it? What is your experience/opinion?