Trang web này sẽ có chức năng hạn chế trong khi chúng tôi trải qua bảo trì để cải thiện trải nghiệm của bạn. Nếu một bài viết không giải quyết được vấn đề của bạn và bạn muốn đặt câu hỏi, chúng tôi có cộng đồng hỗ trợ của chúng tôi đang chờ để giúp bạn tại @FirefoxSupport trên Twitter và /r/firefox trên Reddit.

Tìm kiếm hỗ trợ

Tránh các lừa đảo về hỗ trợ. Chúng tôi sẽ không bao giờ yêu cầu bạn gọi hoặc nhắn tin đến số điện thoại hoặc chia sẻ thông tin cá nhân. Vui lòng báo cáo hoạt động đáng ngờ bằng cách sử dụng tùy chọn "Báo cáo lạm dụng".

Tìm hiểu thêm

Are there really only 64 Add-ons for Firefox 57+

  • 6 trả lời
  • 4 gặp vấn đề này
  • 3 lượt xem
  • Trả lời mới nhất được viết bởi Happy112

more options

With only a month (or less) to go before the launch of Firefox 57, I have been looking for extensions that are compatible with the new version(s). Whenever I click 'Find Replacement' in the Legacy Extensions list (using Firefox Dev Edition) I get the same list of only 64 extensions. Are there really only 64 extensions that are going to work in 57+?

If so it suggests there will be a disaster. Most of my favourite extensions are either late in creating new versions (so will cease until updated), or are going to cease working forever.

The only solution I can see is to stay strictly to version 56 until the situation improves. This of course isn't ideal, but the better of two poor choices.

With only a month (or less) to go before the launch of Firefox 57, I have been looking for extensions that are compatible with the new version(s). Whenever I click 'Find Replacement' in the Legacy Extensions list (using Firefox Dev Edition) I get the same list of only 64 extensions. Are there really only 64 extensions that are going to work in 57+? If so it suggests there will be a disaster. Most of my favourite extensions are either late in creating new versions (so will cease until updated), or are going to cease working forever. The only solution I can see is to stay strictly to version 56 until the situation improves. This of course isn't ideal, but the better of two poor choices.

Tất cả các câu trả lời (6)

more options

hi, no this is just a custom collection curated by mozilla of some of the most popular webextensions.

currently there are nearly 10k addons compatible with firefox 57 listed on addons.mozilla.org alone: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/search/?q=&appver=57.0

more options

Thanks, that makes more sense!

It still seems that whenever I click on 'Find a Replacement' I get shown these same 64 extensions, which is not as helpful as one would like. Trying to search through 10k extensions is daunting. I'll look to see if I can sort alphabetically or by topic.

more options

Suggest you find a better word than replacement when searching. Also use Google when Searching though Extension site is ok. Comparable would be a better choice.

Please let us know if this solved your issue or if need further assistance.

more options

How about : 'Alternative for ' ....... (?)

And/or : 'Compatible with Firefox 57+ ' ........ (?)

more options

Thank you. All useful suggestions. I have been searching more widely.

I still think that where Firefox (Dev Edition) lists 'Legacy Extensions', with a button labelled 'Find a Replacement' beside each Legacy Extension it would be helpful to be taken somewhere relevant to the particular extension rather than to the limited list of 64. Of course, that's more difficult to achieve.

more options

ramasaig said

Thank you. All useful suggestions. I have been searching more widely. I still think that where Firefox (Dev Edition) lists 'Legacy Extensions', with a button labelled 'Find a Replacement' beside each Legacy Extension it would be helpful to be taken somewhere relevant to the particular extension rather than to the limited list of 64. Of course, that's more difficult to achieve.

You are absolutely right  !

As most developers at the time that Dev Edition was written still weren't clear about whether or not they would migrate their add-on to Webextensions (and some still aren't) : almost impossible to provide such list.