This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Denc nañu waxtaan wii. Yónneel yeneen laaj soo soxlaa ndimbal.

What is the expected navigation behavior of a 204 response to a form post.

  • 1 tontu
  • 0 am na jafe-jafe bii
  • 1 view
  • i mujjee tontu mooy grimzecho

grimzecho
grimzecho
more options

According to Mozilla, the 204 No Content response "indicates that a request has succeeded but that the client doesn't need to navigate away from its current page".

However, when Firefox receives such a code in response to a status code, it triggers the `window.onbeforeunload` event and any associated handlers. This has side-effects such as closing any open websocket connections associated with the page, re-rendering the DOM (which fires various lifecycle methods in single page apps), and other similar activities that are generally associated with navigating away from a page.

Is this behavior intended or documented anywhere? Or should it be considered a bug?

According to Mozilla, the [https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Status/204 204 No Content] response "indicates that a request has succeeded but that the client doesn't need to navigate away from its current page". However, when Firefox receives such a code in response to a status code, it triggers the `window.onbeforeunload` event and any associated handlers. This has side-effects such as closing any open websocket connections associated with the page, re-rendering the DOM (which fires various lifecycle methods in single page apps), and other similar activities that are generally associated with navigating away from a page. Is this behavior intended or documented anywhere? Or should it be considered a bug?

All Replies (1)

grimzecho
grimzecho Ki laajte
more options

--edit-- There is a typo. The first sentence of the second paragraph should read: "However, when Firefox receives such a code in response to a form post, it triggers ..."