This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Support ECH or ESNI in 128.2.0esr

  • 1 tontu
  • 0 am na jafe-jafe bii
  • 9 views
  • i mujjee tontu mooy Valentin

Mark Talala
Mark Talala
more options

Hello,

I installed Firefox 128.2.0esr. I set the next parameters in GPO for settings DNSOverHTTPS: "DNSOverHTTPS": { 

                      "Enabled":  true,

"ProviderURL": "https://safe.dot.dns.yandex.net/dns-query", "Locked": true, "Fallback": true }. But when checking via https://www.cloudflare.com/ru-ru/ssl/encrypted-sni/#results I get (screenshot in attachment). As you can see from the screenshot, DNS and SNI did not receive the coveted check marks. Secure DNS We weren’t able to detect whether you were using a DNS resolver over secure transport. Contact your DNS provider or try using 1.1.1.1 for fast & secure DNS. DNSSEC Attackers cannot trick you into visiting a fake website by manipulating DNS responses for domains that are outside their control. TLS 1.3 Nobody snooping on the wire can see the certificate of the website you made a TLS connection to. Secure SNI Anybody listening on the wire can see the exact website you made a TLS connection to.

In my browser / about:config: network.trr.mode = 2 network.trr.uri = https://safe.dot.dns.yandex.net/dns-query

In 128.2.0esr there is no protection against ESNI interceptions and ECH is enabled by default? Or is the problem that the DNS provider does not support the technology from Mozilla? Or what other settings we need use (via GPO)?

Thank you.

Hello, I installed Firefox 128.2.0esr. I set the next parameters in GPO for settings DNSOverHTTPS: "DNSOverHTTPS": { "Enabled": true, "ProviderURL": "https://safe.dot.dns.yandex.net/dns-query", "Locked": true, "Fallback": true }. But when checking via https://www.cloudflare.com/ru-ru/ssl/encrypted-sni/#results I get (screenshot in attachment). As you can see from the screenshot, DNS and SNI did not receive the coveted check marks. '''Secure DNS''' We weren’t able to detect whether you were using a DNS resolver over secure transport. Contact your DNS provider or try using 1.1.1.1 for fast & secure DNS. '''DNSSEC''' Attackers cannot trick you into visiting a fake website by manipulating DNS responses for domains that are outside their control. '''TLS 1.3''' Nobody snooping on the wire can see the certificate of the website you made a TLS connection to. '''Secure SNI''' Anybody listening on the wire can see the exact website you made a TLS connection to. In my browser / about:config: network.trr.mode = 2 network.trr.uri = https://safe.dot.dns.yandex.net/dns-query In 128.2.0esr there is no protection against ESNI interceptions and ECH is enabled by default? Or is the problem that the DNS provider does not support the technology from Mozilla? Or what other settings we need use (via GPO)? Thank you.
Nataali seetu yiñ ci takkaale

NoahSUMO moo ko soppali ci

All Replies (1)

Valentin
Valentin
more options

> Secure DNS We weren’t able to detect whether you were using a DNS resolver over secure transport. Contact your DNS provider or try using 1.1.1.1 for fast & secure DNS.

That just means you aren't using cloudflare's own DNS resolver over an encrypted connection. I get the same when using https://dns.google/dns-query as the DoH provider. The problem is that cloudflare can't know whether the connection between you and the recursive resolver is encrypted or not. I think this is expected behaviour.

> Anybody listening on the wire can see the exact website you made a TLS connection to.

It seems https://safe.dot.dns.yandex.net/dns-query doesn't return the correct ECH configs. Try using a different provider maybe?

Helpful?

Laajal dara

You must log in to your account to reply to posts. Please start a new question, if you do not have an account yet.