为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

What is the actual exact order of the cipher suites offered by firefox client when making ssl/tls handshake?

  • 2 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 10 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 emmy786

more options

When I click about:config and type 'security.ssl3.' in the search box, I got the list of cipher suites that firefox supports ordered alphabetically. In SSL protocol, the client send the supported cipher suites to the server. In some cases, the order of these ciphers in the client make difference on the choice of the server. I need to know what is the exact actual order that firefox client presents to SSL server? Tanks.

When I click about:config and type 'security.ssl3.' in the search box, I got the list of cipher suites that firefox supports ordered alphabetically. In SSL protocol, the client send the supported cipher suites to the server. In some cases, the order of these ciphers in the client make difference on the choice of the server. I need to know what is the exact actual order that firefox client presents to SSL server? Tanks.

所有回复 (2)

more options
more options

Thanks. I viewed the code. I am trying to understand. I found a list of ciphersuites starting from line 84. Here is what is says: /* Deprecated SSL 3.0 & libssl names replaced by IANA-registered TLS names. */ 85 #ifndef SSL_DISABLE_DEPRECATED_CIPHER_SUITE_NAMES 86 #define SSL_NULL_WITH_NULL_NULL TLS_NULL_WITH_NULL_NULL . .

Ok, what I understand is that firefox offers no authentication no encryption (no security) as first option, if the server accept this, it will choose it? Because the first NULL means no authentication, the second NULL means no encryption, and the third means no Hash function.

am I right in my interpretation?

If you have a definite answer of what order does firefox client offers to ssl/tls server, please, provide me with accurate answer. I am not sure of my own interpretation for the code.