为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

Cookies and JavaScript allow, disallow and exceptions

  • 4 个回答
  • 3 人有此问题
  • 4 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 user1072808

more options

Hello Mozilla Freaks, Worldwide :)

This is not actually a support/problem issue, but rather a suggestion for future versions. It would be really awesome if Firefox would have the ability to make cookies and JavaScript exceptions as Google Chrome can. Let me explain what I mean.

JavaScript: Firefox doesn't have the ability to allow/disallow JavaScript per site/domain. Yes, I know about the NoScript extension, but it doesn't compete with Chrome's simplicity. As to Ghostery, it's a great extension, but it does NOT address JavaScript at all.

Cookies: With cookies, Firefox does have the ability to make per site/domain exceptions, but Chrome still has the upper hand here because you can make those exceptions based on, not only the specific site, but also per protocol. You can make an Allow exception for https://[*.]mozilla.com, and cookies will be rejected on regular http://*.mozilla.com, but will be allowed on https. This additional ability is more important with JavaScript, and Chrome does have that too, but its good to have with cookies too.

Really, if Firefox can mimic these two, I would dump Chrome for good. I believe many others would too. I'm no developer, so I really don't know what it takes...... Thanks alot anyway :)

Hello Mozilla Freaks, Worldwide :) This is not actually a support/problem issue, but rather a suggestion for future versions. It would be really awesome if Firefox would have the ability to make cookies and JavaScript exceptions as Google Chrome can. Let me explain what I mean. JavaScript: Firefox doesn't have the ability to allow/disallow JavaScript per site/domain. Yes, I know about the NoScript extension, but it doesn't compete with Chrome's simplicity. As to Ghostery, it's a great extension, but it does NOT address JavaScript at all. Cookies: With cookies, Firefox does have the ability to make per site/domain exceptions, but Chrome still has the upper hand here because you can make those exceptions based on, not only the specific site, but also per protocol. You can make an Allow exception for https://[*.]mozilla.com, and cookies will be rejected on regular http://*.mozilla.com, but will be allowed on https. This additional ability is more important with JavaScript, and Chrome does have that too, but its good to have with cookies too. Really, if Firefox can mimic these two, I would dump Chrome for good. I believe many others would too. I'm no developer, so I really don't know what it takes...... Thanks alot anyway :)

所有回复 (4)

more options

Feedback to Mozilla can be submitted here: https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/feedback For the most part, the contributors who provide support here are other users, and don't work for Mozilla or doing any Firefox development.

more options

Yeah, the-edmeister. I only realized that after I posted it. I then sent this in over there too. Thanks anyway.

more options

选择的解决方案

more options

Thanks cor-el. Though Chrome does these stuff better and simpler than all others, these add-ons will do for now. Really hope that future versions will directly address these 2 zones.