为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

filter move followed by another move duplicates message

  • 3 个回答
  • 3 人有此问题
  • 1 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 Wirewrap

more options

Running Thunderbird 31.4.0 on Windows 7 64-bit

I have two filters in my inbox

Filter Wildcard: If To doesn´t contain "xxxxxxxx" Move message to Wildcard

Filter MoveAll: Move Message to Incoming

After sending a message that correctly goes to wildcard there is a unwanted action of "MoveAll" that makes a duplicate of the wildcarded message.

Filter log : Applied filter "Wildcard" to message from Lars <lars@someone.com> - sssss at 2015-02-06 22:51:08 moved message id = 54D5374C.6040309@telia.com to mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Wildcard

Applied filter "MoveAll" to message from - at 1970-01-01 01:00:00 moved message id = to mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Incoming

Running Thunderbird 31.4.0 on Windows 7 64-bit I have two filters in my inbox Filter Wildcard: If To doesn´t contain "xxxxxxxx" Move message to Wildcard Filter MoveAll: Move Message to Incoming After sending a message that correctly goes to wildcard there is a unwanted action of "MoveAll" that makes a duplicate of the wildcarded message. Filter log : Applied filter "Wildcard" to message from Lars <lars@someone.com> - sssss at 2015-02-06 22:51:08 moved message id = 54D5374C.6040309@telia.com to mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Wildcard Applied filter "MoveAll" to message from - at 1970-01-01 01:00:00 moved message id = to mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Incoming

由Wirewrap于修改

被采纳的解决方案

Maybe you need to add the "stop filter execution" action to the first filter?

定位到答案原位置 👍 2

所有回复 (3)

more options

选择的解决方案

Maybe you need to add the "stop filter execution" action to the first filter?

more options

Zenos said

Maybe you need to add the "stop filter execution" action to the first filter?

Is there a point in having "Stop filter execution" as last action in a filter? I will try it and see.

For most messages, when the first filter isn´t triggered I want the second filter to take effect.

Sort of:

if (first filter trigger ) then

  <one action>

else

 <other action>

由Wirewrap于修改

more options

Zenos said

Maybe you need to add the "stop filter execution" action to the first filter?

This post removed, my mistake.

由Wirewrap于修改