为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

Is there a way to allow remote content without putting the related address in the address book ?

  • 1 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 3 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 christ1

more options

Hi,

I would like to allow remote content without putting the related address in the address book.

When allowing remote content for an email address, Thunderbird automatically adds this address to the address book. Therefore, when I write an e-mail, such address displays uselessly in the recipient dropbox.

So, my question is : - is there a way to allow remote content without putting the related address in the address book ?

Thank you in advance for any reply.

Patrick

Hi, I would like to allow remote content without putting the related address in the address book. When allowing remote content for an email address, Thunderbird automatically adds this address to the address book. Therefore, when I write an e-mail, such address displays uselessly in the recipient dropbox. So, my question is : - is there a way to allow remote content without putting the related address in the address book ? Thank you in advance for any reply. Patrick

被采纳的解决方案

When allowing remote content for an email address, Thunderbird automatically adds this address to the address book.

Not anymore.

is there a way to allow remote content without putting the related address in the address book ?

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/remote-content-in-messages

定位到答案原位置 👍 1

所有回复 (1)

more options

选择的解决方案

When allowing remote content for an email address, Thunderbird automatically adds this address to the address book.

Not anymore.

is there a way to allow remote content without putting the related address in the address book ?

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/remote-content-in-messages