为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

Latest Firefox Dev 64 bit @ Win8 does not detect Java 8u51 64 bit

  • 14 个回答
  • 105 人有此问题
  • 6 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 Ondřej

more options

Java 8u45 worked OK in Firefox Dev 64 bit. This week I uninstalled Java 8u45 and installed new Java 8u51 into `C:\Java`. Now the plugin is not listed in Plugins at about:addons.

Java 8u45 worked OK in Firefox Dev 64 bit. This week I uninstalled Java 8u45 and installed new Java 8u51 into `C:\Java`. Now the plugin is not listed in Plugins at about:addons.

被采纳的解决方案

at the moment it's a hardcoded whitelist in firefox so i don't think it possible to work around that. maybe there will be some form of user controlled whitelist at a later stage, but the strategy that was put forward for win64 around plugins is a "clean slate approach": https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/win64/meetingarchive#Clean_Slate_Approach

定位到答案原位置 👍 2

所有回复 (14)

more options

hi iki, that's to be expected - windows 64bit versions come with limited plugin support at the moment (only flash is whitelisted). if you depend on other npapi plugins please continue to use regular 32bit builds.

more options

hi philipp, thanks for fast reply.

I can switch to 32 bit, but would prefer to stay with 64 bit. Is there a way to whitelist the Java plugin? I'm asking, because it worked perfectly with our Java app before last Firefox Dev update.

more options

选择的解决方案

at the moment it's a hardcoded whitelist in firefox so i don't think it possible to work around that. maybe there will be some form of user controlled whitelist at a later stage, but the strategy that was put forward for win64 around plugins is a "clean slate approach": https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/win64/meetingarchive#Clean_Slate_Approach

more options

OK, that makes sense

... otoh Java plugin could be evaluated too, because NPAPI is now definitely disabled in Chrome>=42, and Firefox is the first choice for Java apps atm.

more options

Weelll folks that means your only choice for Java at this point is Window Internet Explorer which worked today with Java 8 u66.

I think it is not-acceptable to not retain support for Java in the 64-bit frame while supporting it in the 32-bit version.

Another important point, is to take care of users, not like Chrome and provide a transition from the now plug-in container scheme to the new plug-in container scheme(s) -- Plural because these things are always improving. Be agile, ... be prepared.

philipp said

at the moment it's a hardcoded whitelist in firefox ...
more options

I am praying for Java support in 64bit version of Firefox for Windows. There is no other acceptable web browser for me.

more options

If you need Java install the 32-bit version of Firefox to use when you want Java. It is possible to have both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Firefox installed.

more options

the-edmeister said

If you need Java install the 32-bit version of Firefox to use when you want Java. It is possible to have both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Firefox installed.

Why should I have installed two versions?! I installed 64bit version just to utilize 16 GB of memory so I will not install 32bit version. Is 64bit Java support planned or not?

more options

No, it isn't planned.

And by the end of 2016 or in early 2017, Firefox won't be supporting any Plugins at all. All web browsers are in the process dropping "Plugins".

more options

the-edmeister said

No, it isn't planned. And by the end of 2016 or in early 2017, Firefox won't be supporting any Plugins at all. All web browsers are in the process dropping "Plugins".

I hope that this is some really bad joke.

more options
more options
more options

XPI extensions has nothing to do with the end of support for NPAPI Plugins; two different types of add-ons.

more options

According to this, Adobe Flash which uses NPAPI will be supported furthermore. I think NPAPI should be dropped completely, not partially.