为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

Old problem - spell-checker find "panose"

  • 3 个回答
  • 2 人有此问题
  • 3 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 Matt

more options

After reading the questions/answers about this problem, I investigated further. I have a signature file used on all my outgoing message, replies, or forwards. In the HTML source of that file, there is a section defining what some previous reply mentioned: a definition of apparently alternative font faces, notably "PANOSE-1".

I deleted this section from the signature file and then tried it out. Success! - the spell-check problem had disappeared without changing the appearance of the signature.

So this is the answer, not a new/repeated question.

After reading the questions/answers about this problem, I investigated further. I have a signature file used on all my outgoing message, replies, or forwards. In the HTML source of that file, there is a section defining what some previous reply mentioned: a definition of apparently alternative font faces, notably "PANOSE-1". I deleted this section from the signature file and then tried it out. Success! - the spell-check problem had disappeared without changing the appearance of the signature. So this is the answer, not a new/repeated question.

被采纳的解决方案

seriously I can not find the question. But it sounds like menu people you have ignored or not been aware of the standard advice to compose your signature within Thunderbird, encountered a problem and then had to fix it.

About the worst thing you can do is paste from a word processing package. None really do a good job if it. Word is abysmal, including in Cascading Style Sheets as it does everything that is defined in the normal.dot file.

If pasting from such sources plain text Ctrl+Shift+V is preferable as it does not mess up the document your writing.

定位到答案原位置 👍 0

所有回复 (3)

more options

选择的解决方案

seriously I can not find the question. But it sounds like menu people you have ignored or not been aware of the standard advice to compose your signature within Thunderbird, encountered a problem and then had to fix it.

About the worst thing you can do is paste from a word processing package. None really do a good job if it. Word is abysmal, including in Cascading Style Sheets as it does everything that is defined in the normal.dot file.

If pasting from such sources plain text Ctrl+Shift+V is preferable as it does not mess up the document your writing.

more options

Matt, you are quite right that I, and probably many others who have contributed to this topic over several years, were not aware of the standard advice.

But even though I did not follow it then, the spell-checker has varied a number of times even when the signature did not. Up to last month, it had (correctly) ignored the invisible occurrence of "Panose" for a year or more. Suddenly, after the latest update, the so-called spelling error made its appearance again.

So how were the innocent (non-technical) users to realise that it was their own fault, not that of Thunderbird's experts?

more options

More to the point, the detection is a bug and should be filed as one.

Unfortunately Thunderbird is at it's heart old and while some would call it mature one of the issues this brings is complexity. Small changes in one place cause regressions in others. This sounds like a regression we have had before as you say. So if you can reliably make it happen, file a bug. Give the developers the signature as a method to reproduce and they will usually fix such things fairly quickly as it is really annoying for everyone concerned.

File bug here https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ Product: Core Component: Spelling Checker