为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

Should the category be saved with the imap message?

  • 5 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 2 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 gulbrain

more options

This started as a question of mail rules but, as often found when describing the problem in more detail, an alternative possibility that explains more symptoms arose ...

With Thunderbird 38.5.0 (although it may be a mail provider issue).

I have a 301 rules. Predominantly, and critically for the one I investigated, these rules: - When run manually or getting mail before junk classification: - Match all of the following: is the message from/to/cc/bcc: [full email address] - When matched: Tag the message 'purple'; Copy message to another imap INBOX(B); move message to a Local Folder; Stop filter Execution

And a rule to run at the end: - When run manually or getting mail before junk classification: - If the message has no 'purple' category: Add a star; Tag the message 'blue'

And, for reasons that seemed logical at the time, that end rule is also done in INBOX(B) whereupon the message gets moved back to INBOX(A)... seems odd: explanation below.

I'm finding that messages are still being processed by the rule in INBOX(B), despite having been given the 'purple' category and moved back to INBOX(A).

I've switched off the rule in INBOX(B) for now.

Can anyone suggest why/if the category isn't saved, causing the filter to fire?

my odd rules explained (I think!)

My mail provider gives me unlimited accounts, so I use, eg "randomacc@mydomain.org" when I give my email address to Random, Inc. When I receive a message to "randomacc@mydomain.org" I know into which folder to file it. Largely, INBOX(B) contains mails I know about, INBOX(A) contains either mails I have yet no rule for or someone trying to spam me.

Advantages of this is that if I get a mail to "specialaddrformybank@mydomain.org", I can have some confidence - unless my bank's been hacked.

The end rule in INBOX(B) was to catch "LuckyGuessAtMySecretMailAccount@mydomain.org".

The end rule in INBOX(A) flags messages I know I should write a rule for or unsubscribe or ... actually, they're in INBOX(A) : that should do the trick!

Thanks for reading: thanks even more if you can offer an answer!

This started as a question of mail rules but, as often found when describing the problem in more detail, an alternative possibility that explains more symptoms arose ... With Thunderbird 38.5.0 (although it may be a mail provider issue). I have a 301 rules. Predominantly, and critically for the one I investigated, these rules: - When run manually or getting mail before junk classification: - Match all of the following: is the message from/to/cc/bcc: [full email address] - When matched: Tag the message 'purple'; Copy message to another imap INBOX(B); move message to a Local Folder; Stop filter Execution And a rule to run at the end: - When run manually or getting mail before junk classification: - If the message has no 'purple' category: Add a star; Tag the message 'blue' And, for reasons that seemed logical at the time, that end rule is also done in INBOX(B) whereupon the message gets moved back to INBOX(A)... seems odd: explanation below. I'm finding that messages are still being processed by the rule in INBOX(B), despite having been given the 'purple' category and moved back to INBOX(A). I've switched off the rule in INBOX(B) for now. Can anyone suggest why/if the category isn't saved, causing the filter to fire? === my odd rules explained (I think!) === My mail provider gives me unlimited accounts, so I use, eg "randomacc@mydomain.org" when I give my email address to Random, Inc. When I receive a message to "randomacc@mydomain.org" I know into which folder to file it. Largely, INBOX(B) contains mails I know about, INBOX(A) contains either mails I have yet no rule for or someone trying to spam me. Advantages of this is that if I get a mail to "specialaddrformybank@mydomain.org", I can have some confidence - unless my bank's been hacked. The end rule in INBOX(B) was to catch "LuckyGuessAtMySecretMailAccount@mydomain.org". The end rule in INBOX(A) flags messages I know I should write a rule for or unsubscribe or ... actually, they're in INBOX(A) : that should do the trick! Thanks for reading: thanks even more if you can offer an answer!

所有回复 (5)

more options

Just noticed while writing a new rule - some rules copy to INBOX(B), then move to Local Folder and these are troubled. Some rules copy to Local Folder and then move to INBOX(B) and these seem to work OK...

more options

once you move, there is no message to examine further. Simple as that. So any process in the filter that occurs after a move does not occur at all.

more options

The only step in the filter processing after "move" is "stop filter execution". Then it finds " a new message " in INBOX(B) and runs that rule under the remit of "it's a new message". Problem is that the 'purple' category that should be assigned by then is not stopping this rule unless the filter copies the message to a local folder before moving it to INBOX(B).

more options

I would hazard a guess that the filter update of colour to the server is not complete when the message is moved. IMAP changes take time to propagate. It might only be milliseconds, but it is still an overhead that local actions do not suffer. In might even be the move gets processed on the server first. but I think your dealing with a complex IMAP interaction

more options

Mmmm - a race condition ?

Rules shuffled (now they each copy to local folder before moving to INBOX(B))

Seems to be working OK - but there's only been 2-3 mails. I'll keep an eye on it.