We're calling on all EU-based Mozillians with iOS or iPadOS devices to help us monitor Apple’s new browser choice screens. Join the effort to hold Big Tech to account!

为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

When export address book the contacts are listed in order put in the addrees book, not alphabetically.

  • 5 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 1 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 Matt

more options

When I add or modify an address it is entered in the address book in alphabetical order. BUT, when I export the address book it is exporting the recent additions in the order entered, at the end of the existing alphabetical entries. Existing contacts remain in alphabetical order, unless modified, then entered as a new one. That is, appears in the book alphabetically, but as the last entry in the CSV and LDIF files . Example: Contacts A,B, C. Add B1, and the Book is A,B,B1,C. When exported, to either CSV or LDIF, it is A, B, C, B1. I did the global reindexing. I know it started sometime between last September and November, because I checked my old back up address books.

When I add or modify an address it is entered in the address book in alphabetical order. BUT, when I export the address book it is exporting the recent additions in the order entered, at the end of the existing alphabetical entries. Existing contacts remain in alphabetical order, unless modified, then entered as a new one. That is, appears in the book alphabetically, but as the last entry in the CSV and LDIF files . Example: Contacts A,B, C. Add B1, and the Book is A,B,B1,C. When exported, to either CSV or LDIF, it is A, B, C, B1. I did the global reindexing. I know it started sometime between last September and November, because I checked my old back up address books.

被采纳的解决方案

Whats global reindexing and what does it have to do with the address book?

Other than you, I doubt anyone is interested in the order of records in a CSV file. Modern applications dynamically sort data as a matter of course.

定位到答案原位置 👍 0

所有回复 (5)

more options

Since Thunderbird can re-sort on display, I would think that it dynamically sorts according to current settings and so it doesn't matter (to Thunderbird itself) about the order within the address book data file.

Sorting the file and writing it back to disk would take longer than just displaying it in the required order. And how would it work with a remote address book?

It would be fairly trivial to re-sort a CSV file yourself in a spreadsheet program if the order is important to you. I've never tried working with an LDIF file, though I read that there are tools for viewing, and hopefully, manipulating their contents.

more options

I wish it was that simple. There are other problems that have cropped up. It is not every time that the modified entry appears in its rightful place. A couple of times the contact just disappeared from the address book. I would like to have the program running as it should. It will save me a good deal of concern and grief.

more options

I might add that when I did the Global reindexing, it showed it indexed all the folders, but no entry was made for reindexing the address book.

more options

Fixed the problem by resorting in a CSV file, and importing corrected address book.

more options

选择的解决方案

Whats global reindexing and what does it have to do with the address book?

Other than you, I doubt anyone is interested in the order of records in a CSV file. Modern applications dynamically sort data as a matter of course.