为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

How do I add "invalid" RSS links that work fine in other readers

  • 1 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 3 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 Matt

more options

I am on Tails version 4.0, and Thunderbird version 60.9.0 (64-bit)

3/4ths of the podcast links that I used to be able to view in the tor browser do not validate on https://validator.w3.org/feed/

I used to be able to view these feeds just fine in the tor browser, and it would be odd if 3/4ths of the podcasts that I listen to all screwed up their RSS configuration, so I assume this is a thunderbird or w3 validator issue.

An example would be Hello Internet: http://www.hellointernet.fm/ http://www.hellointernet.fm/podcast?format=rss https://validator.w3.org/feed/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hellointernet.fm%2Fpodcast%3Fformat%3Drss

I am on Tails version 4.0, and Thunderbird version 60.9.0 (64-bit) 3/4ths of the podcast links that I used to be able to view in the tor browser do not validate on https://validator.w3.org/feed/ I used to be able to view these feeds just fine in the tor browser, and it would be odd if 3/4ths of the podcasts that I listen to all screwed up their RSS configuration, so I assume this is a thunderbird or w3 validator issue. An example would be Hello Internet: http://www.hellointernet.fm/ http://www.hellointernet.fm/podcast?format=rss https://validator.w3.org/feed/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hellointernet.fm%2Fpodcast%3Fformat%3Drss

所有回复 (1)

more options

I do not have an answer for you, but clicking that link to the web site and clicking the RSS feeds link in the heading causes firefox to pop up something about what to do with a link to a Podcast, instead of open the feed page in Firefox. So I think the issue might be in the core Mozilla platform, not in Thunderbird as such. That is if the RSS feeds are in fact valid.

Opening the same link is chrome displayed the XML source and then Chrome asked if the link was a feed. If it was actually correct I would have expected better handing. However loading some of my feeds in Chrome saw the same ugly interface and raw data display. So I really do not know.