Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

My version of FF no longer works with FB (and quite a few other sites)

  • 9 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 2 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 elzach

more options

Today I see that FB fails to load my profile photo album. I get a spinning circle, description and comments section to the right is blank (or photo loads but no description). I check my connection activity, it's basically at 10 kbps. I run some speed tests, no problem.

So I go to MS Edge, everything on FB loads in an instant.

So the problem is FF. And that's on top of the 50%-100% of CPU that every click on FB produces. I compared it with Edge, 5%-50% of CPU.

So before I give up on FF and switch to Edge, can someone recommend another version of FF that is relatively lightweight for a low spec laptop? The latest version is a no go, as I understand it needs at least 8-16 GB of memory (!).

Thank you.

Today I see that FB fails to load my profile photo album. I get a spinning circle, description and comments section to the right is blank (or photo loads but no description). I check my connection activity, it's basically at 10 kbps. I run some speed tests, no problem. So I go to MS Edge, everything on FB loads in an instant. So the problem is FF. And that's on top of the 50%-100% of CPU that every click on FB produces. I compared it with Edge, 5%-50% of CPU. So before I give up on FF and switch to Edge, can someone recommend another version of FF that is relatively lightweight for a low spec laptop? The latest version is a no go, as I understand it needs at least 8-16 GB of memory (!). Thank you.

被采纳的解决方案

At least you need to download the full installer and do a custom install in a different folder if you want to keep the old 52 version.

What is wrong with setting the new version as the default browser or do you only want to use it for cases like this where 52 doesn't work ?

Firefox usually asks if you want to set Firefox as the default browser, so you can decline if you do not want to set the new version as the default browser.

You need to start Firefox at least the first time with the -P switch to get the Profile Manager and create a new profile. The new Firefox version should remember this choice and you can start it without using the Profile Manager (i.e. remove the -P command line switch). To be sure that Firefox 52 isn't using the new profile you need to start Firefox 52 once with the -P switch and make sure that you tick the box to always use this profile.

定位到答案原位置 👍 1

所有回复 (9)

more options

I forgot to mention, the version I'm using is 52.8.1

more options

It is quite possible that Facebook no longer supports Firefox 52. On a 32-bit platform you can only have 4 GB memory and Firefox should still work properly on such a platform. Recent Firefox versions should still work on Windows 7, so maybe try Firefox 78 ESR with a new profile. Firefox 78.3.1 ESR:

You can possibly limit the number of content processes to 1.

more options

Thank you. That's what I was looking for, a specific updated version.

Now the question is, how do I run a new version of FF, leaving the original version (and folders) intact. That's not so simple, having just researched the topic. For one thing, Windows registry treats the newly installed version as the default browser.

I'm going to find out more, from this topic: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2249039 One solution might be to start the new version from the command C: prompt (oh boy).

more options

I replied, but it has to be "approved" by a moderator.

more options

选择的解决方案

At least you need to download the full installer and do a custom install in a different folder if you want to keep the old 52 version.

What is wrong with setting the new version as the default browser or do you only want to use it for cases like this where 52 doesn't work ?

Firefox usually asks if you want to set Firefox as the default browser, so you can decline if you do not want to set the new version as the default browser.

You need to start Firefox at least the first time with the -P switch to get the Profile Manager and create a new profile. The new Firefox version should remember this choice and you can start it without using the Profile Manager (i.e. remove the -P command line switch). To be sure that Firefox 52 isn't using the new profile you need to start Firefox 52 once with the -P switch and make sure that you tick the box to always use this profile.

more options

Thank you.

Out of curiosity, what happens if I choose not to create a new profile (as in my case there's really no problem with extensions, no troubleshooting etc)? The new version will take and use my existing profile? And if I uninstall the new version later?

more options

It is not possible to downgrade a profile used by Firefox 81.0.2 to Firefox 52. Once used by Firefox 81.0.2 then this profile won't work properly in 52. If you want to keep the option to return to 52 or want to use both versions then you need a separate profile for each version.

more options

Thanks so much. Very helpful info.

Btw, the reason I want to keep FF as my primary browser is its bookmarks capability. Second to none. I use them and organize them a lot.

more options

Just a heads up. I updated to 68.12 ESR and I notice improvement, memory usage went slightly up (about 1 GB for 2 tabs, FB and Yahoo mail), but CPU usage went down to 0%-50%. No more overheating fan going on constantly.

I'll wait and see if I should update to 78 ESR.

One thing though, I see FF did away with "Description" in Bookmarks. Not "Keyword" or "Tags", the extra "description" for each bookmark. People used that to add notes to certain bookmarks and it was very helpful (example, you apply to job ads and could put notes of when, replies etc.) Perhaps I'll post that question in a separate thread.