为提升您的使用体验，本站正在维护，部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题，您想要向社区提问的话，请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问，我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

Avatar for Username

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信，及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

话题已存档。 如果需要帮助请提出新问题。

Filters don't always work on Inbox.

  • 2 个回答
  • 2 人有此问题
  • 9 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 Hwedhlor

Hwedhlor
Hwedhlor
more options

Filters don't always work on new messages in the Inbox.

Most of my filters are set to look for specific "From" entries then move them to the appropriate folders for each message. When email is downloaded from the server some filters work, but some hang up and require me to click on the displayed message to acknowledge that message. Once all the acknowledgements have been done, and while I am still in the Inbox, I then click on "Tools/Run Filters on Folder" and ALL of the messages that did not originally get moved to the correct folders per the filters set for them, now work beautifully!

Why won't some filters work when first run on Inbox, but they work later, and how can I avoid the laborious manual response requirement for those that don't work the first time? I should add that there is no consistency to which filters run, or do not run. Even when I go to the folder for a message that did not get moved to that folder, and "fix" that folder, some future messages still don't get moved the first time through running filters when those messages arrive in the Inbox.

Filters don't always work on new messages in the Inbox. Most of my filters are set to look for specific "From" entries then move them to the appropriate folders for each message. When email is downloaded from the server some filters work, but some hang up and require me to click on the displayed message to acknowledge that message. Once all the acknowledgements have been done, and while I am still in the Inbox, I then click on "Tools/Run Filters on Folder" and ALL of the messages that did not originally get moved to the correct folders per the filters set for them, now work beautifully! Why won't some filters work when first run on Inbox, but they work later, and how can I avoid the laborious manual response requirement for those that don't work the first time? I should add that there is no consistency to which filters run, or do not run. Even when I go to the folder for a message that did not get moved to that folder, and "fix" that folder, some future messages still don't get moved the first time through running filters when those messages arrive in the Inbox.

由Wayne Mery于修改

被采纳的解决方案

Is your account IMAP? If so have your filters been set to run after classification? If not try setting them to that. It delays the filters just a little and makes the body available is my guess, but it does appear to reduce apparent failures to run.

定位到答案原位置 👍 0

所有回复 (2)

Matt
Matt
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

选择的解决方案

Is your account IMAP? If so have your filters been set to run after classification? If not try setting them to that. It delays the filters just a little and makes the body available is my guess, but it does appear to reduce apparent failures to run.

Hwedhlor
Hwedhlor 提问者
more options

Matt,

Thanks very much for your reply! My account is a POP account.

Your suggestion was right on the money! Unfortunately there is no convenient way to change all filters from running before classification to running after classification, but after changing all 480 of my filters to running after classification I no longer get the popup messages advising me a message cannot be filed!

I have over 900 folders, and this was a convenient way to review the filters I have set, so I was able to delete several filters that I no longer require. Getting rid of the very annoying popups was a considerable improvement to efficient running. I've worked with/operated/programmed/maintained computers since 1964. The first ones I worked with had vacuum tube amplifiers. :-) I carry on considerable e-mail correspondence and filters help me avoid having to manually file incoming messages.

Thanks once again for your very useful recommendation!

All the best,

John