为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

'Junk' and 'No Junk' buttons swap.

  • 1 个回答
  • 0 人有此问题
  • 13 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 Wisewiz

more options

When I click the 'Junk' button, everything works as expected, the email gets moved to the 'Junk' folder, but the 'Junk' button simply switches to 'Non Junk'. Then, when I click it again on another junk email, that email gets moved to the Junk folder as expected, but the 'Not Junk' button gets changed back to 'Junk'. So, the 'Junk' and 'Not Junk' buttons simply swap out on each click.

When I click the 'Junk' button, everything works as expected, the email gets moved to the 'Junk' folder, but the 'Junk' button simply switches to 'Non Junk'. Then, when I click it again on another junk email, that email gets moved to the Junk folder as expected, but the 'Not Junk' button gets changed back to 'Junk'. So, the 'Junk' and 'Not Junk' buttons simply swap out on each click.

所有回复 (1)

more options

I think, but I'm not absolutely sure, that you're describing the default behavior of Thunderbird. The Junk button toggles between "Junk" and "Not Junk" depending upon the junk status of a message. You can mark something as not junk by marking it as junk twice. The junk button and clicking on the entry in the junk status column basically just toggle the junk setting.

If you select a message and click Junk, and the button changes, then if you click on and open another message, the button should toggle back to Junk. If you use the keyboard shortcuts, you'll save yourself some confusion. Select a message and type j, and it will be marked as junk. Select a message in your Inbox and type Shift+j (=cap J), and it will be marked Not Junk, and the filter learns from that action. Select a message in the Junk/Spam folder and type Shift+j (cap J), and the message will be marked Not Junk and moved back into the Inbox.

It's a muddle as far as I'm concerned, but it is what it is.