为提升您的使用体验，本站正在维护，部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题，您想要向社区提问的话，请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问，我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

Avatar for Username

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信，及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

话题已存档。 如果需要帮助请提出新问题。

Why is firefox using the (presumably broken) RC4 128bit SSL encryption as highest priority default encryption?

  • 1 个回答
  • 6 人有此问题
  • 8 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 cor-el

anouser0850
anouser0850
more options

128 bit encryption is no longer a real security deal. There are known attacks on RC4 and there is a warning from NIST to do not longer use it in a new product. Firefox uses an internal list on prefered cipher suites. Why does firefox do not request for 256 bit encryption as default (AES and Camellia) and in a second step, if negotiation with an outdated server fails, fall back to 128 bit encryption? I know the user can block 128bit from about:config, but why is such an insecure and outdated SSL encryption option the default behaviour?

128 bit encryption is no longer a real security deal. There are known attacks on RC4 and there is a warning from NIST to do not longer use it in a new product. Firefox uses an internal list on prefered cipher suites. Why does firefox do not request for 256 bit encryption as default (AES and Camellia) and in a second step, if negotiation with an outdated server fails, fall back to 128 bit encryption? I know the user can block 128bit from about:config, but why is such an insecure and outdated SSL encryption option the default behaviour?

所有回复 (1)

cor-el
cor-el
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

You can disable the 128 bit RC4 ciphers by setting the related security.ssl3.* prefs to false.
If you need to visit a server that only works with an 128 cipher suite then you can enable one or two 128 SSL ciphers.
Note that some servers host CSS files on such servers with older server software.

  • security.ssl3.rsa_rc4_128_md5
  • security.ssl3.rsa_rc4_128_sha