為了改善您的使用體驗,本網站正在進行維護,部分功能暫時無法使用。若本站的文件無法解決您的問題,想要向社群發問的話,請到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 發問,我們的社群成員將很快會回覆您的疑問。

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

Thunderbird v31.0 complete buglist page has v24.0 content

more options

The Thunderbird 31.0 Release Notes page links to "the complete list of changes in this release." The link target is <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/31.0/releasenotes/buglist.html>.

This page has version "31.0" in the URL, but it has content identical to the version "24.0" bug list. Compare: <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/24.0/releasenotes/buglist.html> - Both pages say "v.24.0" at the top - Both bug lists begin with "783872 Don't pass ints to NS_FAILED"

I suspect that there is a correct buglist for v31.0 somewhere, and it would be good to publish this data under the v31.0 URL. Or, change the link in the Release Notes page to point to the actual 31.0 buglist.

Having the incorrect buglist doesn't block me from trying Thunderbird, but it does look like a detail that should perhaps be corrected.

What is the correct way to report this issue? Is this forum post sufficient, or should I report it elsewhere?

Thanks to everyone who made this release of Thunderbird. I'm looking forward to it.

The Thunderbird 31.0 Release Notes page links to "the complete list of changes in this release." The link target is <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/31.0/releasenotes/buglist.html>. This page has version "31.0" in the URL, but it has content identical to the version "24.0" bug list. Compare: <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/24.0/releasenotes/buglist.html> - Both pages say "v.24.0" at the top - Both bug lists begin with "783872 Don't pass ints to NS_FAILED" I suspect that there is a correct buglist for v31.0 somewhere, and it would be good to publish this data under the v31.0 URL. Or, change the link in the Release Notes page to point to the actual 31.0 buglist. Having the incorrect buglist doesn't block me from trying Thunderbird, but it does look like a detail that should perhaps be corrected. What is the correct way to report this issue? Is this forum post sufficient, or should I report it elsewhere? Thanks to everyone who made this release of Thunderbird. I'm looking forward to it.

所有回覆 (2)

more options

http://www.rumblingedge.com/ Try that alternative link. Much more comprehensive.

As for the page having old data. A bug has been filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1042240

The lack of new features in the release notes is this bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1042526

more options

Thank you, Matt. I've added a comment to bug 1042240.