為了改善您的使用體驗,本網站正在進行維護,部分功能暫時無法使用。若本站的文件無法解決您的問題,想要向社群發問的話,請到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 發問,我們的社群成員將很快會回覆您的疑問。

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

In write email, addresses are not sorted for easy selection and often appear in red when found (V31.3).

  • 1 回覆
  • 1 有這個問題
  • 10 次檢視
  • 最近回覆由 Zenos

more options

A small 'feature'.... Using Thunderbird 31.3.0 on WIndows 7 and Windows 8 (2 different machines). In the 'Write' email window when trying to select addresses from the address book, the address list presented is not sorted. On typing the first letter of the address, the unsorted list is presented, on typing the second letter, the 2 letters are disaplayed in red. If you scroll down the list to find the wanted address, it can be selected and the email is sent ok (it just shows the address in red). Thanks.

A small 'feature'.... Using Thunderbird 31.3.0 on WIndows 7 and Windows 8 (2 different machines). In the 'Write' email window when trying to select addresses from the address book, the address list presented is not sorted. On typing the first letter of the address, the unsorted list is presented, on typing the second letter, the 2 letters are disaplayed in red. If you scroll down the list to find the wanted address, it can be selected and the email is sent ok (it just shows the address in red). Thanks.

被選擇的解決方法

Keep typing. The search now uses "contains" whereas in the past it used "starts with".

The red is a bug and of no real consequence so long as you are careful to accept the address as offered.

Of greater concern with the current version is that it reportedly doesn't always fill in the address you chose. I'm not sure what triggers this as I haven't been able to replicate it.

從原來的回覆中察看解決方案 👍 0

所有回覆 (1)

more options

選擇的解決方法

Keep typing. The search now uses "contains" whereas in the past it used "starts with".

The red is a bug and of no real consequence so long as you are careful to accept the address as offered.

Of greater concern with the current version is that it reportedly doesn't always fill in the address you chose. I'm not sure what triggers this as I haven't been able to replicate it.