為了改善您的使用體驗,本網站正在進行維護,部分功能暫時無法使用。若本站的文件無法解決您的問題,想要向社群發問的話,請到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 發問,我們的社群成員將很快會回覆您的疑問。

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

Why does mozilla Thunderbird Adressbook 'ldap implementation require special schema when you could use fields that are redily available in the basic schemes.

  • 1 回覆
  • 2 有這個問題
  • 1 次檢視
  • 最近回覆由 Matt

more options

Hi i found it very disturbing that people who program mozilla's address book didn't think of looking at what basic core shema and additional basic ldap implementation had for ldap fields

for example a very basic install of slapd provides "homePostalAddress, postalAddress,registeredAddress,postalCode , street, l (locality) st (state), etc all fields/attributes that could be used to store home addresses , work addresses etc .

instead you just decided that instead of looking up those fields/attributes ( that are pretty standard) you would just lookup random "homebrew" attributes that no other application or software will use. not only at the expense of the technician who will need to fill those in but also duplicating efforts on top of efforts. compound this with the fact that pretty much all of you guys pull the same shit in every other address book application : ms exchange, android ab , iphone address book etc ... cant you guys get your dam ducks in row and use readily available info / structure ? or at least look at what others are doing and try to standardize this crap . its not that hard just takes a bit of dedication in doing your work properly.

Hi i found it very disturbing that people who program mozilla's address book didn't think of looking at what basic core shema and additional basic ldap implementation had for ldap fields for example a very basic install of slapd provides "homePostalAddress, postalAddress,registeredAddress,postalCode , street, l (locality) st (state), etc all fields/attributes that could be used to store home addresses , work addresses etc . instead you just decided that instead of looking up those fields/attributes ( that are pretty standard) you would just lookup random "homebrew" attributes that no other application or software will use. not only at the expense of the technician who will need to fill those in but also duplicating efforts on top of efforts. compound this with the fact that pretty much all of you guys pull the same shit in every other address book application : ms exchange, android ab , iphone address book etc ... cant you guys get your dam ducks in row and use readily available info / structure ? or at least look at what others are doing and try to standardize this crap . its not that hard just takes a bit of dedication in doing your work properly.

所有回覆 (1)

more options