為了改善您的使用體驗,本網站正在進行維護,部分功能暫時無法使用。若本站的文件無法解決您的問題,想要向社群發問的話,請到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 發問,我們的社群成員將很快會回覆您的疑問。

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

Do tracking protection addons interfere with Firefox's Enhanced Tracking Protection?

  • 4 回覆
  • 1 有這個問題
  • 13 次檢視
  • 最近回覆由 Evan Bremer

more options

I currently have Privacy Badger and Privacy Possum installed and activated in my desktop browser, but I also have Firefox's Enhanced Tracking Protection turned on and set to Strict as well. Some sites I go to, both Badger and Possum say that they are blocking trackers, yet the Firefox ETP Shield doesn't indicate that anything is being blocked at all. Is it possible that both Badger and Possum are interfering with Firefox ETP, keeping it from working by getting to the trackers first? If that is the case, is it a good idea to keep these addons or should I let ETP handle all the work with protecting me from trackers?

I currently have Privacy Badger and Privacy Possum installed and activated in my desktop browser, but I also have Firefox's Enhanced Tracking Protection turned on and set to Strict as well. Some sites I go to, both Badger and Possum say that they are blocking trackers, yet the Firefox ETP Shield doesn't indicate that anything is being blocked at all. Is it possible that both Badger and Possum are interfering with Firefox ETP, keeping it from working by getting to the trackers first? If that is the case, is it a good idea to keep these addons or should I let ETP handle all the work with protecting me from trackers?

被選擇的解決方法

Hi,

It does not require a Firefox update for the definitions to update. They are loaded from a blacklist file that is updated separately.

I am basing this answer largely off the fact that there exists a "browser.safebrowsing.provider.mozilla.updateURL: server endpoint for downloading list updates" setting in about:config which implies to me that the list must update outside of FF updates.

Hope that helps!

從原來的回覆中察看解決方案 👍 1

所有回覆 (4)

more options

Hello,

I cannot be 100% sure without looking into those extensions. However, I think that they probably are not interfering with Firefox ETP. It is likely that on most sites they are just good enough to block trackers before Firefox ETP is able to block them itself.

The tracking protection that you use is up to you. However, you might find slowdowns if you use Badger, Possum, and ETP at the same time because all will have to run their filters before the page can display.

Hope this helps! Have a nice day!

more options

Matthew Thomas said

Hello, I cannot be 100% sure without looking into those extensions. However, I think that they probably are not interfering with Firefox ETP. It is likely that on most sites they are just good enough to block trackers before Firefox ETP is able to block them itself. The tracking protection that you use is up to you. However, you might find slowdowns if you use Badger, Possum, and ETP at the same time because all will have to run their filters before the page can display. Hope this helps! Have a nice day!

Thank you for your response. This does somewhat put me at ease that there aren't any real problems going on, but this does lead to one more question.

Does Firefox's ETP ever go through any kind of update process so that it stays effective? I know that both Badger and Possum are addons that "learn" about new trackers as you surf the web so that they can keep protecting you. Does ETP have a similar process or does it only learn about new things when the whole browser itself updates?

more options

選擇的解決方法

Hi,

It does not require a Firefox update for the definitions to update. They are loaded from a blacklist file that is updated separately.

I am basing this answer largely off the fact that there exists a "browser.safebrowsing.provider.mozilla.updateURL: server endpoint for downloading list updates" setting in about:config which implies to me that the list must update outside of FF updates.

Hope that helps!

more options

Matthew Thomas said

Hi, It does not require a Firefox update for the definitions to update. They are loaded from a blacklist file that is updated separately. I am basing this answer largely off the fact that there exists a "browser.safebrowsing.provider.mozilla.updateURL: server endpoint for downloading list updates" setting in about:config which implies to me that the list must update outside of FF updates. Hope that helps!

It does. Thank you for all your help!