Join the AMA (Ask Me Anything) with the Firefox leadership team to celebrate Firefox 20th anniversary and discuss Firefox’s future on Mozilla Connect. Mark your calendar on Thursday, November 14, 18:00 - 20:00 UTC!

為了改善您的使用體驗,本網站正在進行維護,部分功能暫時無法使用。若本站的文件無法解決您的問題,想要向社群發問的話,請到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 發問,我們的社群成員將很快會回覆您的疑問。

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

Firefox 102 Renaming .exe files

more options

I've noticed that with Firefox 102 when I download an exe file, in this case Thunderbird Setup 102.0.exe it is renaming it to Thunderbird Setup 102.0.exe.bin.

Why is that happening now? I know the "potential risk" or downloading an .exe file but shouldn't it ask or at least warn you instead of just deciding to rename it

I didn't see a setting to disable this "feature". Is there one?

Thanks

I've noticed that with Firefox 102 when I download an exe file, in this case Thunderbird Setup 102.0.exe it is renaming it to Thunderbird Setup 102.0.exe.bin. Why is that happening now? I know the "potential risk" or downloading an .exe file but shouldn't it ask or at least warn you instead of just deciding to rename it I didn't see a setting to disable this "feature". Is there one? Thanks

被選擇的解決方法

AZBigDog said

There was ONE instance of it in that file and this is what it says (sorry the screenshot is so small)

Hmm, that shouldn't be there. Even if it is there, Firefox should ignore it. I think *not* ignoring it is a bug.

Can you match that up with any visible listings in the Applications list on the Settings page? I guess even if you can, there isn't a way to delete the handler from there.

Traditionally, we would suggest renaming the handlers.json file (while Firefox is closed) to something like handlersOLD.json. At the next startup, Firefox should create a new one with a few default handler definitions. Recently, some users are not getting Gmail back when they do that, so if you rely on Firefox opening Gmail for links like mailto:boss@example.com then I wouldn't recommend that approach at the moment.

That said, editing the file by hand is a bit painful....

從原來的回覆中察看解決方案 👍 0

所有回覆 (5)

more options

There was ONE instance of it in that file and this is what it says (sorry the screenshot is so small)

由 AZBigDog 於 修改

more options

Your Firefox settings and info are kept in a folder separate from the Firefox program, called your profile folder. Try creating a test profile, to see if the problem still occurs. See Profile Manager - Create, remove or switch Firefox profiles.

more options

選擇的解決方法

AZBigDog said

There was ONE instance of it in that file and this is what it says (sorry the screenshot is so small)

Hmm, that shouldn't be there. Even if it is there, Firefox should ignore it. I think *not* ignoring it is a bug.

Can you match that up with any visible listings in the Applications list on the Settings page? I guess even if you can, there isn't a way to delete the handler from there.

Traditionally, we would suggest renaming the handlers.json file (while Firefox is closed) to something like handlersOLD.json. At the next startup, Firefox should create a new one with a few default handler definitions. Recently, some users are not getting Gmail back when they do that, so if you rely on Firefox opening Gmail for links like mailto:boss@example.com then I wouldn't recommend that approach at the moment.

That said, editing the file by hand is a bit painful....

more options

After playing around with it, BIN files were associated with PowerArchiver which was not surprising. EXEs from only Mozilla sites being renamed to BIN was though.

Still not sure what is different about EXEs from there to trip that flag. Anyway I figured I have nothing to lose by renaming that handler.json file (worse case scenario I could rename it back). So, when it created the new one, THAT fixed it.

Thanks

more options

AZBigDog said

After playing around with it, BIN files were associated with PowerArchiver which was not surprising. EXEs from only Mozilla sites being renamed to BIN was though. Still not sure what is different about EXEs from there to trip that flag.

That's what I've been going on about:

jscher2000 - Support Volunteer said

I notice there is a difference between how these sites characterize the file in the headers sent with the download:
  • Thunderbird download: Content-Type = application/x-msdos-program
  • WinMerge download: Content-Type = application/octet-stream
  • 7-zip download: Content-Type = application/octet-stream
  • Notepad++ download: Content-Type = application/octet-stream
  1. 1
  2. 2