為了改善您的使用體驗,本網站正在進行維護,部分功能暫時無法使用。若本站的文件無法解決您的問題,想要向社群發問的話,請到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 發問,我們的社群成員將很快會回覆您的疑問。

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

Why won't my site work on Firefox mobile?

more options

I have a blog hosted on Render. The base URL provided by them is https://parker-codes.onrender.com. This URL works perfectly, in all browsers.

I purchased a domain from Google and then linked a CNAME record to the Render one: https://blog.parker-codes.dev. This URL works in many browsers except for Firefox Mobile (on Android). I receive the error "Address not found. The browser could not find the host server for the provided address."

- I flushed the DNS cache and checked that it propagated across the globe. I used nslookup to verify the domain resolution. - I tested in various other browsers on desktop (Safari, Chrome, Firefox) and mobile (Chrome) and they all work. - I turned off mobile extensions. I also tried in a private window. Still no luck. - I reached out to Google support. They don't see any domain or DNS issues on their end.

From all of this, it appears that the Firefox mobile browser has a bug that can't load the site for some reason. It can't properly resolve the host even though many other browsers can.

I have a blog hosted on Render. The base URL provided by them is https://parker-codes.onrender.com. This URL works perfectly, in all browsers. I purchased a domain from Google and then linked a CNAME record to the Render one: https://blog.parker-codes.dev. This URL works in many browsers except for Firefox Mobile (on Android). I receive the error "Address not found. The browser could not find the host server for the provided address." - I flushed the DNS cache and checked that it propagated across the globe. I used nslookup to verify the domain resolution. - I tested in various other browsers on desktop (Safari, Chrome, Firefox) and mobile (Chrome) and they all work. - I turned off mobile extensions. I also tried in a private window. Still no luck. - I reached out to Google support. They don't see any domain or DNS issues on their end. From all of this, it appears that the Firefox mobile browser has a bug that can't load the site for some reason. It can't properly resolve the host even though many other browsers can.

被選擇的解決方法

The issue was inside the CNAME record.

ANSWER SECTION:

blog.parker-codes.dev. 3600 IN CNAME https\://parker-codes.onrender.com.

Which is kind of weird it was not happening when we use the desktop version, but only affected by mobile not being able to read the record properly

Removing the https\:// inside the record solved the issue.

從原來的回覆中察看解決方案 👍 1

所有回覆 (10)

more options

Doesn't work for me as well on Android. I also checked the DNS Lookup tool on the about:networking page.

It is weird that Qualys isn't able to analyze blog.parker-codes.dev.

more options

......

由 jonzn4SUSE 於 修改

more options

.....

由 jonzn4SUSE 於 修改

more options

@jonzn4SUSE You have entered the wrong URL for the browser testing you did. It's not "onerender", it's "onrender".

more options

it works for me.  ;-))

由 jonzn4SUSE 於 修改

more options

Exactly. That link works, but that is what the hosting platform provides. My domain CNAME doesn't work on FF mobile: https://blog.parker-codes.dev

Perhaps it's the .dev that Firefox doesn't like. I'm not sure. That's why I posted it here.

more options

I'm finally on the same page.  ;-))

more options

I figured it out, and frankly it's quite dumb that Google doesn't validate the address that is entered into the DNS record.

The solution was to remove the "https://" from the CNAME record so it was just "parker-codes.onrender.com". Now it works as expected.

more options

選擇的解決方法

The issue was inside the CNAME record.

ANSWER SECTION:

blog.parker-codes.dev. 3600 IN CNAME https\://parker-codes.onrender.com.

Which is kind of weird it was not happening when we use the desktop version, but only affected by mobile not being able to read the record properly

Removing the https\:// inside the record solved the issue.