為了改善您的使用體驗,本網站正在進行維護,部分功能暫時無法使用。若本站的文件無法解決您的問題,想要向社群發問的話,請到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 發問,我們的社群成員將很快會回覆您的疑問。

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

Desmos extreme CPU usage

more options

Hello, long time Firefox user here!

Open site https://www.desmos.com/calculator, a well-known site for math graphing In a completely empty graph (no sources of CPU usage), select settings (top right wrench button) and select the polar grid option (circular grid). Simply click and wiggle the coordinate space a bit and CPU will quickly reach 100% usage.

Tech stats: Firefox x64 (newest version), high CPU usage occurred with and without active extensions, my CPU is a i7 8-core 4GHz

This does *not* happen if a different browser is used (e.g. I tested with Chromium), or Desmos is used with the regular cartesian grid option. Ram usage and GPU usage are negligible either way.

Related: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1446863 they claim "low fps" but I'm guessing that's a symptom of high CPU usage.

Thank You in advance! Daniel

Hello, long time Firefox user here! Open site https://www.desmos.com/calculator, a well-known site for math graphing In a completely empty graph (no sources of CPU usage), select settings (top right wrench button) and select the polar grid option (circular grid). Simply click and wiggle the coordinate space a bit and CPU will quickly reach 100% usage. Tech stats: Firefox x64 (newest version), high CPU usage occurred with and without active extensions, my CPU is a i7 8-core 4GHz This does *not* happen if a different browser is used (e.g. I tested with Chromium), or Desmos is used with the regular cartesian grid option. Ram usage and GPU usage are negligible either way. Related: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1446863 they claim "low fps" but I'm guessing that's a symptom of high CPU usage. Thank You in advance! Daniel

所有回覆 (2)

more options

Moving the polar graph around uses significant CPU for me on both Firefox and Chromium. Firefox uses about 20% more but is also smoother and more responsive. A bottlenecked GPU can produce lower CPU usage but is actually due to lower performance.

more options

zeroknight said

Moving the polar graph around uses significant CPU for me on both Firefox and Chromium. Firefox uses about 20% more but is also smoother and more responsive.

Thanks for your reply. It seems that you can't reproduce my issue. Firefox uses *significantly* more CPU on Firefox, and Chromium uses *negligible* CPU for simply moving around the graph. (You don't need to convince me that Firefox is better, I still prefer it over Chromium - this post is just about a single issue.)

zeroknight said

A bottlenecked GPU can produce lower CPU usage but is actually due to lower performance.

I don't understand what you're saying, sorry. My GPU is (barely) being utilized when moving around the graph.