為了改善您的使用體驗,本網站正在進行維護,部分功能暫時無法使用。若本站的文件無法解決您的問題,想要向社群發問的話,請到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 發問,我們的社群成員將很快會回覆您的疑問。

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

Is Firefox history really that ehm ... 'unwise'?

  • 1 回覆
  • 0 有這個問題
  • 最近回覆由 poljos

more options

Hey.

So.. I'm really trying to stick with Firefox (it's 115.14.0 ESR 64bit on Win 10, in case that matters. Not sure about versions on my Debian 12 and Android 13, but it's all up to date as possible). Even in these times when it has lost most of its popularity. But you're not making it easy for me...

Today I discovered, when I was trying to find links I visited exactly a year ago, that Firefox no longer remembers the history even from that time. *facepalm* This is completely unacceptable to me. I really don't understand how anyone could sit down and say to himself "This is a good idea!"...

Now... I remember when I was using Opera some years ago that it was capable to keep at least 5 years of history for sure (at least that's the latest I ever went). Based on this, I assume that there is a solution. I'm sure that Firefox is not stupid than at least ten years old Opera... Right?! I read about 'places.history.expiration.transient_current_max_pages', 'places.history.expiration.max_pages' and 'places.history.expiration.transient_optimal_database_size' in about:config. But I also read that it's not very safe way to fix the history.

So, is there any smarter solution? Come on, history is most basic feature. Please don't force me to switch because of it *sigh*

Kindly thank you all in advance

Hey. So.. I'm really trying to stick with Firefox (it's 115.14.0 ESR 64bit on Win 10, in case that matters. Not sure about versions on my Debian 12 and Android 13, but it's all up to date as possible). Even in these times when it has lost most of its popularity. But you're not making it easy for me... Today I discovered, when I was trying to find links I visited exactly a year ago, that Firefox no longer remembers the history even from that time. *facepalm* This is completely unacceptable to me. I really don't understand how anyone could sit down and say to himself "This is a good idea!"... Now... I remember when I was using Opera some years ago that it was capable to keep at least 5 years of history for sure (at least that's the latest I ever went). Based on this, I assume that there is a solution. I'm sure that Firefox is not stupid than at least ten years old Opera... Right?! I read about 'places.history.expiration.transient_current_max_pages', 'places.history.expiration.max_pages' and 'places.history.expiration.transient_optimal_database_size' in about:config. But I also read that it's not very safe way to fix the history. So, is there any smarter solution? Come on, history is most basic feature. Please don't force me to switch because of it *sigh* Kindly thank you all in advance

所有回覆 (1)

more options

Tohle je jenom "podpora" uživatel - uživatel. Asi potřebuješ pokecat přímo s autory Firefoxu: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org

有幫助嗎?

問個問題

如果您還沒有帳號,您必須先登入帳號 來回覆文章。還沒有帳號的話,只能發問新問題