為了改善您的使用體驗,本網站正在進行維護,部分功能暫時無法使用。若本站的文件無法解決您的問題,想要向社群發問的話,請到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 發問,我們的社群成員將很快會回覆您的疑問。

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

Firefox binds to absolute add-on paths, why?

  • 6 回覆
  • 0 有這個問題
  • 7 次檢視
  • 最近回覆由 tbphotb837

more options

I tried to create a default Windows profile with pre-configured app settings, including FF. I created a temporary user, logged in, installed FF and configured it, also installed some add-ons (first of all, ublock origin). Then I logged out, logged as an administrator and moved the temporary user profile to the default profile location (c:\Users\Temp -> c:\Users\Default), and then reset its NTFS permissions. This almost always works for all applications, including Google Chrome. I created a new user and logged in, opened FF. The settings were applied, but the extensions did NOT work, and even the buttons on the toolbar looked like empty squares. At the same time, the add-ons were present in the list of add-ons in settings, although without icons. It helped to turn off and turn on all the add-ons one by one, manually.

After some research, I realized that FF binds its settings to absolute paths to add-on files (*.xpi), specifically in the $profile/extensions.json and $profile/addonStartup.json.lz4 files. Google Chrome, for example, doesn't do anything simular, like the vast majority of applications. Removing these files from the profile will cause all add-ons to be "reinstalled" on first launch and set to a disabled status.

An easier way to reproduce the problem: 1. Run firefox -profile d:\temp\profile1 2. Install some extensions. 3. Rename profile1 folder to profile2. 4. Run firefox -profile d:\temp\profile2 5. Got it!

For what purposes does firefox bind to absolute add-on paths, and how can this problem be solved? P.S. I know about portable firefox from PortableApps.com, but I don't want to use a third-party loader for my tasks.

I tried to create a default Windows profile with pre-configured app settings, including FF. I created a temporary user, logged in, installed FF and configured it, also installed some add-ons (first of all, ublock origin). Then I logged out, logged as an administrator and moved the temporary user profile to the default profile location (c:\Users\Temp -> c:\Users\Default), and then reset its NTFS permissions. This almost always works for all applications, including Google Chrome. I created a new user and logged in, opened FF. The settings were applied, but the extensions did NOT work, and even the buttons on the toolbar looked like empty squares. At the same time, the add-ons were present in the list of add-ons in settings, although without icons. It helped to turn off and turn on all the add-ons one by one, manually. After some research, I realized that FF binds its settings to absolute paths to add-on files (*.xpi), specifically in the $profile/extensions.json and $profile/addonStartup.json.lz4 files. Google Chrome, for example, doesn't do anything simular, like the vast majority of applications. Removing these files from the profile will cause all add-ons to be "reinstalled" on first launch and set to a disabled status. An easier way to reproduce the problem: 1. Run firefox -profile d:\temp\profile1 2. Install some extensions. 3. Rename profile1 folder to profile2. 4. Run firefox -profile d:\temp\profile2 5. Got it! For what purposes does firefox bind to absolute add-on paths, and how can this problem be solved? P.S. I know about portable firefox from PortableApps.com, but I don't want to use a third-party loader for my tasks.
附加的畫面擷圖

被選擇的解決方法

I'd suggest you creating a new bug about it, with a reference to these bugs and an additional note that paths are not being recomputed.

從原來的回覆中察看解決方案 👍 0

所有回覆 (6)

more options

有幫助嗎?

more options

The bug is several years old, will it ever be fixed? Why prescribe absolute paths for add-ons at all? A a lot of programs can be expanded with addons, most of them can use relative paths. Chrome does. Many people have encountered this problem, but for some reason it has not yet been fixed, despite the fact that the solution should be very simple. Is there some objective reason?

And do I understand correctly that at the moment the only way is to either use a third-party loader or write your own script?

有幫助嗎?

more options

Yes, for me it looks like an architectural bug. I don't know whether they going to fix it, as "it seems that the addons mechanism knows how to recompute the JSON file and its paths in the event that the absolute paths do not match."

有幫助嗎?

more options

TyDraniu said

Yes, for me it looks like an architectural bug. I don't know whether they going to fix it, as "it seems that the addons mechanism knows how to recompute the JSON file and its paths in the event that the absolute paths do not match."

But the problem is precisely that it does not recompute the paths?

有幫助嗎?

more options

選擇的解決方法

I'd suggest you creating a new bug about it, with a reference to these bugs and an additional note that paths are not being recomputed.

有幫助嗎?

more options

有幫助嗎?

問個問題

如果您還沒有帳號,您必須先登入帳號 來回覆文章。還沒有帳號的話,只能發問新問題