為了改善您的使用體驗,本網站正在進行維護,部分功能暫時無法使用。若本站的文件無法解決您的問題,想要向社群發問的話,請到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 發問,我們的社群成員將很快會回覆您的疑問。

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

【Feature Request】Consider adding "SM4”

more options

For more: SM2 by ISO SM2 by ISO.

Advantages in brief:

1. Much less size (fixed size to 256 bits) only, compared with RSA (2048 or 4096 bits) and ECC (128-512 bits).

2. Much faster, compared with RSA in decryption/encryption, a little faster than ECC.

3. With encryption/decryption functions/key changing with each other.

4. Free to the public.

5. Safe in use.

For more: [https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cuiling-dnsop-sm2-alg-14.html SM2 by ISO] SM2 by ISO. Advantages in brief: 1. Much less size (fixed size to 256 bits) only, compared with RSA (2048 or 4096 bits) and ECC (128-512 bits). 2. Much faster, compared with RSA in decryption/encryption, a little faster than ECC. 3. With encryption/decryption functions/key changing with each other. 4. Free to the public. 5. Safe in use.

所有回覆 (1)

more options

Where to change the topic? In fact, SM2/3/4/9 are passed by ISO and the other related orgs.

有幫助嗎?

問個問題

如果您還沒有帳號,您必須先登入帳號 來回覆文章。還沒有帳號的話,只能發問新問題