為了改善您的使用體驗,本網站正在進行維護,部分功能暫時無法使用。若本站的文件無法解決您的問題,想要向社群發問的話,請到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 發問,我們的社群成員將很快會回覆您的疑問。

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

Print Preview and Print itselt don't show correct result

  • 5 回覆
  • 11 有這個問題
  • 1 次檢視
  • 最近回覆由 ddreamer

more options

As title, the results of Print and Print Preview are apparently wrong.

URL of affected sites

http://www.arsgeek.com/2007/05/17/5-steps-to-create-a-pdf-printer-print-to-pdf-in-ubuntu/

As title, the results of Print and Print Preview are apparently wrong. == URL of affected sites == http://www.arsgeek.com/2007/05/17/5-steps-to-create-a-pdf-printer-print-to-pdf-in-ubuntu/

所有回覆 (5)

more options

What do you see in Print Preview? And, what do you think you should see in Print Preview?

How does it vary from what is printed to paper? I didn't waste my paper and ink to print it.


IMO, that page really should have a print.css file to allow the viewer to print only 4 sheets of paper that article would appear on and not the other 14 pages of garbage that isn't content of that article. (your page counts in Print Preview may vary from mine, due to variables in settings and hardware)

more options

Hi, the-edmeister:

       Is the result of your printing so similar to the looks of the website? NOT AT ALL in my case. I will attach a PDF file containing just the first page of the printing result to show you how much the difference is. The results of "Print Review" and "Print" are coherent to each other but they are incoherent to the real looks of the website.
      Does "Print Preview" waste any ink and paper of yours? I don't think so.
more options

Well, it just don't show pdf file. Then, I attach the jpg version.

more options

That's the way the first page looks for me. That's why I said that page needs a print.css file so that garbage isn't printed.

more options

Since Firefox can resolve the web page correctly on screen, why can't Firefox send correct data to the printer to make the print result correct? So, it is a bug!