Този сайт ще има ограничена функционалност, докато се извършва тече неговата поддръжка. Ако дадена статия не може реши проблема ви и искате да зададете въпрос, нашата общност е готова да ви помогне на @firefox в Twitter и /r/firefox в Reddit.

Търсене в помощните статии

Избягвайте измамите при поддръжката. Никога няма да ви помолим да се обадите или изпратите SMS на телефонен номер или да споделите лична информация. Моля, докладвайте подозрителна активност на "Докладване за злоупотреба".

Научете повече

Can't use multiple identites

  • 2 отговора
  • 1 има този проблем
  • 1 изглед
  • Последен отговор от Claytonlad

more options

Hi I'm using TB 52.4.0 on Centos Linux. I have been happily using multiple identities with Plusnet's POP service. After a few hiccups i thought I'd look out another email provider and settled on mail.co.uk If i stick to the one registered email address, everything works fine but unlike with Plusnet, you don't appear to be able to have a different identity to the Server settings. You get a message saying that the sender doesn't own the address or words to that effect. Is this surmountable as for convenience, I use about 16 different addresses on my domain. TIA

Hi I'm using TB 52.4.0 on Centos Linux. I have been happily using multiple identities with Plusnet's POP service. After a few hiccups i thought I'd look out another email provider and settled on mail.co.uk If i stick to the one registered email address, everything works fine but unlike with Plusnet, you don't appear to be able to have a different identity to the Server settings. You get a message saying that the sender doesn't own the address or words to that effect. Is this surmountable as for convenience, I use about 16 different addresses on my domain. TIA

Избрано решение

You're right of course. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.  :-)

Прочетете този отговор в контекста 👍 0

Всички отговори (2)

more options

You need to address this question to whoever it is that runs mail.co.uk.

more options

Избрано решение

You're right of course. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction.  :-)