Mozilla VPN is currently experiencing an outage. Our team is actively working to resolve the issue. Please check the status page for real-time updates. Thank you for your patience.

This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

This thread was archived. Please ask a new question if you need help.

Display last name 1st in Address Book

  • 1 reply
  • 1 has this problem
  • 1 view
  • Last reply by Zenos

lauwassr
lauwassr
more options

I want my Address Book to display LastName 1st. I recently lost my address book entries with a to-and-back transfer between PCs. I rebuilt the list from old emails (RightClick on each recipient-->"Add to Address Book") and have restored over 500.

The problem is that each shows up in the alpha listing by the pre@ lettering. When I RightClick-->EditContact I see the full display name but the separate first & last name fields are blank. I can manually fill those fields but....if the display name is already there, why aren't the separate fields populated? The View-->ShowNameAs-->LastFirst does work but only for the entries in which I've keyed in the first and last name fields.

This was already an issue with me before I restored the list but is magnified now with the 500 names.

In Help, I see my I'm up to date with TB 52.3.0 (32bit). I have Windows10 but 64-bit. Is that a problem?

I want my Address Book to display LastName 1st. I recently lost my address book entries with a to-and-back transfer between PCs. I rebuilt the list from old emails (RightClick on each recipient-->"Add to Address Book") and have restored over 500. The problem is that each shows up in the alpha listing by the pre@ lettering. When I RightClick-->EditContact I see the full display name but the separate first & last name fields are blank. I can manually fill those fields but....if the display name is already there, why aren't the separate fields populated? The View-->ShowNameAs-->LastFirst does work but only for the entries in which I've keyed in the first and last name fields. This was already an issue with me before I restored the list but is magnified now with the 500 names. In Help, I see my I'm up to date with TB 52.3.0 (32bit). I have Windows10 but 64-bit. Is that a problem?

All Replies (1)

Zenos
Zenos
more options

The address book doesn't know the names. All it can see in an email message is the "display name" and it doesn't attempt to parse this into first name and last name as it has no way of telling how the display name is formulated. Analysing names is one of those things we humans consider trivial but teaching computers to do it is devilishly hard.

If you were entering contacts into the address book by hand it would indeed construct a display name by concatenating first and last names as you typed them in.

Next time, try using the email address crawler add-on. It can suck email addresses en masse out of your messages.

https://freeshell.de/~kaosmos/index-en.html#eac

You'd still have to manually fix the first and last names, but you won't have to do the whole importing thing 500 times. I would copy the display name, paste it into both first and last name boxes then delete the unwanted parts. Using ctrl+shift+left/right/home/end can select the unwanted part of the pasted name very efficiently.

If your display names are well behaved, you might export your new address book to a CSV file, open that in a spreadsheet and use some cell formulae to split the display name into first and last, and insert those into the relevant columns. Save this enhanced version as a CSV file. Then you re-import this CSV file to generate a new address book.

It comes down to whether the extra steps needed to automate the fix-up seem to be more effort than working through all the imported matter and editing it by hand.

Modified by Zenos