This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

I upgraded to 58.0 on Win10, but I'm getting an exploit report from Malwarebytes?

  • 3 پاسخ
  • 3 have this problem
  • 2 views
  • آخرین پاسخ توسّط raconnor

more options

Apparently this is discussed in Bug 1418594.

I have turned off the Exploit detection in Malwarebytes as a TEMPORARY solution. Hope to hear of a fix/repair/upgrade from 58.0 to this problem soon.

Apparently this is discussed in Bug 1418594. I have turned off the Exploit detection in Malwarebytes as a TEMPORARY solution. Hope to hear of a fix/repair/upgrade from 58.0 to this problem soon.

All Replies (3)

more options

And what is the error saying to your screen shot not what is being discussed in Bug 1418594.

more options

raconnor said

Apparently this is discussed in Bug 1418594. I have turned off the Exploit detection in Malwarebytes as a TEMPORARY solution. Hope to hear of a fix/repair/upgrade from 58.0 to this problem soon.

It may not necessarily be a issue with Firefox 58.0. Also the “RET ROP Gadget detection” in Malwarebytes is not checked by default.

https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/219551-firefox-58-malwarebytes-anti-exploit/ and Malwarebytes had a issue with Firefox 58.0b4 back in November https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/215365-firefox-quantum-beta-v-580b4-64b-closed-by-malwarebytes-v-3312183/

more options

Turning off a security feature, even if it is one that is not ON by default, is a serious problem in my book. The previous version of Firefox didn't have the problem, as I have had that feature of Malwarebytes turned on for a good while. So what did you programmers change that "broke" it?