This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Este fío arquivouse. Faga unha nova pregunta se precisa axuda.

Array.length remains the same even though array has element index greater than length set: Bug or feature?

kangjiahuang2007
kangjiahuang2007
more options

I don't really know if this is a bug, or a feature of Firefox's JavaScript core engine. Say I have an array:

var array = [];

I set the length of the array to a very large number:

array.length = 155555555;

This now turns the variable array into an array with 155555555 blank slots. If I then do:

array[502039410402] = 5; // Notice that 502039410402 > the previously set 155555555 for length

array.length remains at 155555555, but the actual array is appended with a sudden index 502039410402 (i.e., index 155555553, 155555554, and then suddenly index 502039410402; see screenshot), with that element containing 5. Is this a bug, or an intended feature?

I would appreciate it if anyone could let me know.

Thanks!

I don't really know if this is a bug, or a feature of Firefox's JavaScript core engine. Say I have an array: var array = []; I set the length of the array to a very large number: array.length = 155555555; This now turns the variable array into an array with 155555555 blank slots. If I then do: array[502039410402] = 5; // Notice that 502039410402 > the previously set 155555555 for length array.length remains at 155555555, but the actual array is appended with a sudden index 502039410402 (i.e., index 155555553, 155555554, and then suddenly index 502039410402; see screenshot), with that element containing 5. Is this a bug, or an intended feature? I would appreciate it if anyone could let me know. Thanks!
Capturas de pantalla anexas

All Replies (2)

cor-el
cor-el
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

The values you use are very large.

Can you replicate this with small values like 50 and 100 and if not, when does it stop working ?

jscher2000 - Support Volunteer
jscher2000 - Support Volunteer
  • Top 25 Contributor
more options

Oh no, array.length isn't read-only? Why, JavaScript, why?! But setting that aside...

The MDN article says length must be less than 232 (4294967296).

Elements with indexes beyond that size seem to exist in a state of limbo, and don't behave like members of the array in array operations:

I've read many times that everything in JavaScript is an object, so perhaps that's why the limbo elements can exist.