We're calling on all EU-based Mozillians with iOS or iPadOS devices to help us monitor Apple’s new browser choice screens. Join the effort to hold Big Tech to account!

This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Avatar for Username

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

This thread was archived. Please ask a new question if you need help.

Why a img tag with negative width value don't render itself on ff?

  • 1 reply
  • 2 have this problem
  • 2 views
  • Last reply by Shadow110

vfiebig
vfiebig
more options

the HTML spec say so that the width and height attributes must be positive integers, but have no mention on what browser should do if it's a negative value. Other browsers ignore the attribute with a invalid attribute and render the tag with the width default value. ``````

the HTML spec say so that the width and height attributes must be positive integers, but have no mention on what browser should do if it's a negative value. Other browsers ignore the attribute with a invalid attribute and render the tag with the width default value. ```<img src="img.png" width="-1">```

Chosen solution

W3C (World Wide Web Consortium in charge of rules and practises web browsers and web pages is what Mozilla follows. Firefox is playing rather strict these days. May find it breaks in a update for another browser sooner or later.

If it does not pass https://validator.w3.org/ for HTML or https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ for CSS then you are doing it wrong.

Making exceptions to rules is not abiding by the rules.

You'll have to hit up some coding places/forums for help. I do some but not enough to help you.

Note : Firefox 57 Quantum release date Nov 14th https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/quantum/ Note : Legacy Extensions will be disabled and or removed.

Please let us know if this solved your issue or if need further assistance.

Read this answer in context 👍 1

All Replies (1)

Shadow110
Shadow110
more options

Chosen Solution

W3C (World Wide Web Consortium in charge of rules and practises web browsers and web pages is what Mozilla follows. Firefox is playing rather strict these days. May find it breaks in a update for another browser sooner or later.

If it does not pass https://validator.w3.org/ for HTML or https://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ for CSS then you are doing it wrong.

Making exceptions to rules is not abiding by the rules.

You'll have to hit up some coding places/forums for help. I do some but not enough to help you.

Note : Firefox 57 Quantum release date Nov 14th https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/quantum/ Note : Legacy Extensions will be disabled and or removed.

Please let us know if this solved your issue or if need further assistance.