This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Wannan tattunawa ta zama daɗaɗɗiya. Yi sabuwar tambaya idan ka na bukatar taimako.

Why is there a problem with 128 bit Encryption from banking websites that can't recognize Firefox as being secure enough when that problem didn't exist previously?

  • 1 amsa
  • 5 sa na da wannan matsala
  • 1 view
  • Amsa ta ƙarshe daga cor-el

more options

Banking websites test web browsers to see if they meet their standards for access. When they test FireFox there is always a problem that it doesn't meet their standards. Then, all we hear from the forum's is that it does meet the standards. That's fine but it doesn't help with the website that we could access previously under the old versions but not with the new one. Although some websites work and others do not I can only guess that this might be a political issue. Enough said.

Banking websites test web browsers to see if they meet their standards for access. When they test FireFox there is always a problem that it doesn't meet their standards. Then, all we hear from the forum's is that it does meet the standards. That's fine but it doesn't help with the website that we could access previously under the old versions but not with the new one. Although some websites work and others do not I can only guess that this might be a political issue. Enough said.

All Replies (1)

more options

It is possible that they look for "U;" in the Firefox user agent and that security section is no longer present in the UA in Firefox 4.