This site will have limited functionality while we undergo maintenance to improve your experience. If an article doesn't solve your issue and you want to ask a question, we have our support community waiting to help you at @FirefoxSupport on Twitter and/r/firefox on Reddit.

Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

AMO review changes to high impact extensions

  • 3 replies
  • 0 have this problem
  • 5 views
  • Last reply by Paul

more options

Hi!

Our extensions are being uploaded manually - meaning they are signed by Mozilla, and the .xpi files are downloaded from the Developer Hub and distributed to our audience by our deployment processes. Following the recent update on the AMO review process: "All extension submissions with a significantly large number of users are now subject to human review by the add-ons review team before approval" - We wanted to know how it may impact our deployment process as now it is subject to human review

Thank you!

Hi! Our extensions are being uploaded manually - meaning they are signed by Mozilla, and the .xpi files are downloaded from the Developer Hub and distributed to our audience by our deployment processes. Following the recent update on the AMO review process: "All extension submissions with a significantly large number of users are now subject to human review by the add-ons review team before approval" - We wanted to know how it may impact our deployment process as now it is subject to human review Thank you!

All Replies (3)

more options

Hi

There would be very little change aside from a little bit more time taken to get signed by Mozilla.

more options

Excellent, thanks for the information

more options

No problem, glad I could help. You may also want to check out the Add-ons forum at:

https://discourse.mozilla.org/c/add-ons/35