Den här webbplatsen har begränsad funktionalitet medan vi utför underhåll för att förbättra din upplevelse. Om en artikel inte löser ditt problem och du vill ställa en fråga har vi vår gemenskap som väntar på att hjälpa dig på @FirefoxSupport på Twitter, /r/firefox på Reddit.

Sök i support

Akta dig för supportbedrägerier: Vi kommer aldrig att be dig att ringa eller skicka ett sms till ett telefonnummer eller dela personlig information. Rapportera misstänkt aktivitet med alternativet "Rapportera missbruk".

Läs mer

With the Sync function of Firefox keeping my desktop and laptop in agreement, do I have any need for Xmarks?

more options

I just responded to an Xmarks popup inviting me to revive my installation of Xmarks. I thought I had removed Xmarks already, because I have been using your Sync option happily. But being in doubt, I let it go ahead with the installation. So now I have both. Does Xmarks do anything Sync doesn't, and if so, what?

I just responded to an Xmarks popup inviting me to revive my installation of Xmarks. I thought I had removed Xmarks already, because I have been using your Sync option happily. But being in doubt, I let it go ahead with the installation. So now I have both. Does Xmarks do anything Sync doesn't, and if so, what?

Vald lösning

Don't use both Xmarks and Sync on the same devices, there have been a number of user reports here of conflicts when using both - such as corrupted data, lost data, or scrambled data.

IMHO, at this time you might be better off using Xmarks, assuming it has been working properly for you. Sync hasn't been working properly for about 5% of its users for a few months now; definitely not a proper level of service to brag about, IMO. And since the inclusion of Add-ons in the sync process, mention of capacity issues requiring more servers.

As far as the differences between Sync and Xmarks, I wouldn't know. I gave up on using it when it was slated to be shut down back in 2010, and then was acquired by Last Pass. I switched to Sync at that time, and feel more comfortable with the level of security provided by Sync (encrypted data before it leaves the users PC, and while on the Sync servers).

Läs svaret i sitt sammanhang 👍 1

Alla svar (3)

more options

Could you please clarify on this? Thank you!

more options

I don't know what you need to know.

1. I use Firefox.

2. I have Win 7 Ultimate running both machines.

3. Firefox has its own Sync function under Options. I have paired my machines.

4. Before that I used Xmarks for the same purpose: to make sure Firefox on both machines has the same bookmarks, passwords, bookmark toolbar tabs, and other settings.

5 . Is there any reason to have both Sync and Xmarks in use?

6. If only one is sufficient, what does Xmarks do that Sync doesn't?

Please tell me what other information you need.

Ändrad av arsesq

more options

Vald lösning

Don't use both Xmarks and Sync on the same devices, there have been a number of user reports here of conflicts when using both - such as corrupted data, lost data, or scrambled data.

IMHO, at this time you might be better off using Xmarks, assuming it has been working properly for you. Sync hasn't been working properly for about 5% of its users for a few months now; definitely not a proper level of service to brag about, IMO. And since the inclusion of Add-ons in the sync process, mention of capacity issues requiring more servers.

As far as the differences between Sync and Xmarks, I wouldn't know. I gave up on using it when it was slated to be shut down back in 2010, and then was acquired by Last Pass. I switched to Sync at that time, and feel more comfortable with the level of security provided by Sync (encrypted data before it leaves the users PC, and while on the Sync servers).