为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

SSL_ERROR_PROTOCOL_VERSION_ALERT Firefox 60.0.2

more options

I am guessing that Firefox recently ran an update because a website that I access regularly without difficulty (https://fortnine.ca/) I can no longer access and get the"Secure Connection Failed SSL_ERROR_PROTOCOL_VERSION_ALERT" error page. This just started recently (well, in the last week because I have not gone to that page in just over a week). I have seen this before and usually WORK AROUND it by copying the link and opening in Chrome. I do not want to do that, I want Firefox to open it. Yes, I do run Adblock Plus and NoScript, but I have NEVER had this error with those running before. Tried to upload a screenshot but that didn't work either. I have been using Firefox since version 1.0 and really don't want to be forced to switch to Chrome because of "feature creep".

I am guessing that Firefox recently ran an update because a website that I access regularly without difficulty (https://fortnine.ca/) I can no longer access and get the"Secure Connection Failed SSL_ERROR_PROTOCOL_VERSION_ALERT" error page. This just started recently (well, in the last week because I have not gone to that page in just over a week). I have seen this before and usually WORK AROUND it by copying the link and opening in Chrome. I do not want to do that, I want Firefox to open it. Yes, I do run Adblock Plus and NoScript, but I have NEVER had this error with those running before. Tried to upload a screenshot but that didn't work either. I have been using Firefox since version 1.0 and really don't want to be forced to switch to Chrome because of "feature creep".

被采纳的解决方案

For me, that link immediately redirects to https://fortnine.ca/en/

Does that page work for you or does it give the same error?

If that also has a problem, could you check to make sure these settings were not changed:

(1) In a new tab, type or paste about:config in the address bar and press Enter/Return. Click the button promising to be careful or accepting the risk.

(2) In the search box above the list, type or paste TLS.VER and pause while the list is filtered

(3) If any of these preferences is bolded and "modified" or "user set", right-click > Reset to restore the default value, and then test again:

  • security.tls.version.fallback-limit
  • security.tls.version.max
  • security.tls.version.min
定位到答案原位置 👍 1

所有回复 (3)

more options

选择的解决方案

For me, that link immediately redirects to https://fortnine.ca/en/

Does that page work for you or does it give the same error?

If that also has a problem, could you check to make sure these settings were not changed:

(1) In a new tab, type or paste about:config in the address bar and press Enter/Return. Click the button promising to be careful or accepting the risk.

(2) In the search box above the list, type or paste TLS.VER and pause while the list is filtered

(3) If any of these preferences is bolded and "modified" or "user set", right-click > Reset to restore the default value, and then test again:

  • security.tls.version.fallback-limit
  • security.tls.version.max
  • security.tls.version.min
more options

Hi, I would say it is your Avast Online Security getting in the way. Run a update and if that does not work I suggest you go to their forum for a Work around.

There is security software like Avast/AVG, Kaspersky, BitDefender and ESET that intercept secure connections and send their own certificate.

Please let us know if this solved your issue or if need further assistance.

more options

Thanks guys, The site did automatically redirect to the https://fortnine.ca/en/ but then still came up with the error. I did find that "security.tls.version.max" had been changed (probably by me at a previous time) to 1 from the default 4, but the site was accessible without problem until quite recently. Not sure about the Avast. It has never cause a problem before that I could find.

Thanks Again Reg