为提升您的使用体验,本站正在维护,部分功能暂时无法使用。如果本站文章无法解决您的问题,您想要向社区提问的话,请到 Twitter 上的 @FirefoxSupport 或 Reddit 上的 /r/firefox 提问,我们的支持社区将会很快回复您的疑问。

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

LDAP (AD) Address query via SLL seems to be broken in TB 78

  • 2 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 10 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 knuffel007

more options

Hi all I had in the options of Thunderbird 68 a directory server entry created, pointing towards our Active directory. I used the SLL Global Catalog LDAP port TCP 3269. Everything worked fine until Thunderbird got automatically updated to version 78 a few weeks ago. Now I can only use the non-SSL port 3268, that works without further modifications but SSL on TCP 3269 does not. There is no error displayed but also never any result from LDAP when inserting recipients. On another PC, where TB 68 is still installed, the SSL query still works. Please give help, how it is possible to switch back to more secure SSL for the directory query.

Config: Hostname: ad01.home.example.com (FQDN of the active directory host) Base DN: dc=home,dc=example,dc=com Port number: 3269 Bind DN: low_priv_username@home.example.com SSL <checked>

Best Regards Ronald

Hi all I had in the options of Thunderbird 68 a directory server entry created, pointing towards our Active directory. I used the SLL Global Catalog LDAP port TCP 3269. Everything worked fine until Thunderbird got automatically updated to version 78 a few weeks ago. Now I can only use the non-SSL port 3268, that works without further modifications but SSL on TCP 3269 does not. There is no error displayed but also never any result from LDAP when inserting recipients. On another PC, where TB 68 is still installed, the SSL query still works. Please give help, how it is possible to switch back to more secure SSL for the directory query. Config: Hostname: ad01.home.example.com (FQDN of the active directory host) Base DN: dc=home,dc=example,dc=com Port number: 3269 Bind DN: low_priv_username@home.example.com SSL <checked> Best Regards Ronald

所有回复 (2)

more options

Is this the same, or similar issue here?

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1659947

more options

Hi sfhowes Yes, indeed, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1659947 describes the same issue (beside the different ports as I query the global catalog LDAP port(s)). It seems to be still under investigation/patch. Best Regards knuffel007