Funkcjonalność tej witryny będzie ograniczona w czasie konserwacji. Jeśli artykuł nie rozwiązuje twojego problemu i chcesz zadać pytanie, to nasza społeczność wsparcia jest dostępna na @FirefoxSupport na Twitterze i /r/firefox na Reddicie.

Przeszukaj pomoc

Unikaj oszustw związanych z pomocą.Nigdy nie będziemy prosić Cię o dzwonienie na numer telefonu, wysyłanie SMS-ów ani o udostępnianie danych osobowych. Zgłoś podejrzaną aktywność, korzystając z opcji „Zgłoś nadużycie”.

Więcej informacji

Own add-ons blocked

  • 8 odpowiedzi
  • 2 osoby mają ten problem
  • 1 wyświetlenie
  • Ostatnia odpowiedź od tom3454

more options

Since some latest fx version my personal add-ons are blocked. I know about all this 'signing' changes but it really annoys me. Before that I can just change the 'xpinstall.signatures.required' flag in about:config and live in peace with this new politic. Now I can't use my own add-ons. I know they will work on ESR version but only for some time (till next ESR version I guess) and I'm not satisfied with temporary solutions. I don't want to sign my add-ons because it's no one's business what I made by myself for myself (plus it's annoying).

So I wonder what should I do to avoid signing my personal add-ons and still use newest firefox (which I love, but lately not as much as before).

Since some latest fx version my personal add-ons are blocked. I know about all this 'signing' changes but it really annoys me. Before that I can just change the 'xpinstall.signatures.required' flag in about:config and live in peace with this new politic. Now I can't use my own add-ons. I know they will work on ESR version but only for some time (till next ESR version I guess) and I'm not satisfied with temporary solutions. I don't want to sign my add-ons because it's no one's business what I made by myself for myself (plus it's annoying). So I wonder what should I do to avoid signing my personal add-ons and still use newest firefox (which I love, but lately not as much as before).

Wybrane rozwiązanie

Developer Edition gets updated almost daily, whenever there is a new check-in. It is an alpha-2 level piece of software that is 6 weeks before the Beta stage of development and 12 weeks before Release.

tom3454 said

... I have a question. If I use this unbranded fx will I still have auto update? I don't want to constantly check if new version is on the server...

When the unbranded version does get updated manually it will become the Release version - doesn't stay as unbranded. I don't know if it does auto update, but I figure that if it does it won't be unbranded any longer.

I installed the unbranded version; then when 48.0.1 was released did a manual update; ended up on the Release channel. Reinstalled it and when 48.0.2 came out the same change to the Release channel. Gabe up after that.

See this for a "fix": http://www.largrizzly.net/firefox.html

Przeczytaj tę odpowiedź w całym kontekście 👍 0

Wszystkie odpowiedzi (8)

more options

hi tom3454, in this case firefox developer edition is for you - you can still set the xpinstall.signatures.required preference there. https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/developer/

more options

Hi philipp, dark skin and additional tools slowing down my browser doesn't sound great. I found "unbranded" firefox edition but it's only in us english and as you can see english isn't my strength. But let's say it's ok. I have a question. If I use this unbranded fx will I still have auto update? I don't want to constantly check if new version is on the server...

more options

please stick with firefox devedition, it's the better choice than the unbranded builds. if you don't like the dark theme then just switch back to the regular one in the firefox menu ≡ > addons > themes panel. none of the dev tools will slow your browser down if you don't use them - they are included in normal firefox release builds as well, but get just a bit more advertised in devedition.

more options

Two more questions: is developer edition auto-updated? And is it build with stable version and released same day or is it unstable or delayed?

more options

yes it is auto-updating and receives updates daily. it is also a pre-release build (like an early beta) which means it receives new features earlier which might make it a bit more unstable than release builds but i've never had a major issue with it and am using it for years now.

more options

So I have to choose between private add-ons and stability (I don't have such good experiences with firefox beta as you and it seems dev edition is build upon nightly builds which doesn't augur well for stability - it's going to be my primary browser).

Backing to unbranded edition, is it just stable version of firefox with all features and auto-update but without logo and duty to signing add-ons or are there some other differences?

more options

Wybrane rozwiązanie

Developer Edition gets updated almost daily, whenever there is a new check-in. It is an alpha-2 level piece of software that is 6 weeks before the Beta stage of development and 12 weeks before Release.

tom3454 said

... I have a question. If I use this unbranded fx will I still have auto update? I don't want to constantly check if new version is on the server...

When the unbranded version does get updated manually it will become the Release version - doesn't stay as unbranded. I don't know if it does auto update, but I figure that if it does it won't be unbranded any longer.

I installed the unbranded version; then when 48.0.1 was released did a manual update; ended up on the Release channel. Reinstalled it and when 48.0.2 came out the same change to the Release channel. Gabe up after that.

See this for a "fix": http://www.largrizzly.net/firefox.html

more options

Thank you the-edmeister, this bypass works great (for now). I don't really get why you have to choose one from freedom (own add-ons), stability and convenience (auto updates). Quo vadis Mozilla?